- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗ plicit 14:39, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
User:Dasiljac/Black turns red
Unnotable band. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dasiljac/Black Turns Red and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Turns Red. -- Minorax«¦ talk¦» 10:13, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Keep- Notability isn't a reason for deleting userspace drafts. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 12:46, 28 August 2022 (UTC)- Ah. So if I understand correctly,
Robert McClenon it was userfied after deletion but the user has shown no interest in actually improving it? Seems like blank or delete would be fine, then, unrelated to notability reasons. —
Rhododendrites
talk \\ 13:47, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- That's right, User:Rhododendrites. The user has shown no interest in improving it because the user hasn't edited in twelve years. This is a zombie page. Robert McClenon ( talk) 20:58, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Ah. So if I understand correctly,
Robert McClenon it was userfied after deletion but the user has shown no interest in actually improving it? Seems like blank or delete would be fine, then, unrelated to notability reasons. —
Rhododendrites
talk \\ 13:47, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
WeakDelete - The deletion nomination for this user page is poorly written. This is one of two user space copies of an article that was deleted in 2012. The two user space copies differed from each other only in capitalization. One of the user copies was deleted by MFD in 2016. If this had been in draft space, it would have been deleted six months after the introduction of G13. It exists only because user space does not have a calendar. However, it exists in the user space of a user who has not edited since 2010, and who only ever edited in order to create an article on this band. This makes it very close to U5, close enough so that a decision at MFD to delete is the right decision. Robert McClenon ( talk) 13:37, 28 August 2022 (UTC)- Delete - Evidently, a moribund draft masquerading as a userspace page, which would have been deleted by G13 if it were a draft.-- 🌈WaltCip-( talk) 15:02, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I usually don't !vote delete on these types of userspace drafts, but the combination of the user's inactivity, the draft's age, and the SPA makes me lean delete, per Robert McClenon. — PerfectSoundWhatever ( t; c) 19:33, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗ plicit 14:39, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
User:Dasiljac/Black turns red
Unnotable band. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dasiljac/Black Turns Red and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Turns Red. -- Minorax«¦ talk¦» 10:13, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Keep- Notability isn't a reason for deleting userspace drafts. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 12:46, 28 August 2022 (UTC)- Ah. So if I understand correctly,
Robert McClenon it was userfied after deletion but the user has shown no interest in actually improving it? Seems like blank or delete would be fine, then, unrelated to notability reasons. —
Rhododendrites
talk \\ 13:47, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- That's right, User:Rhododendrites. The user has shown no interest in improving it because the user hasn't edited in twelve years. This is a zombie page. Robert McClenon ( talk) 20:58, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Ah. So if I understand correctly,
Robert McClenon it was userfied after deletion but the user has shown no interest in actually improving it? Seems like blank or delete would be fine, then, unrelated to notability reasons. —
Rhododendrites
talk \\ 13:47, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
WeakDelete - The deletion nomination for this user page is poorly written. This is one of two user space copies of an article that was deleted in 2012. The two user space copies differed from each other only in capitalization. One of the user copies was deleted by MFD in 2016. If this had been in draft space, it would have been deleted six months after the introduction of G13. It exists only because user space does not have a calendar. However, it exists in the user space of a user who has not edited since 2010, and who only ever edited in order to create an article on this band. This makes it very close to U5, close enough so that a decision at MFD to delete is the right decision. Robert McClenon ( talk) 13:37, 28 August 2022 (UTC)- Delete - Evidently, a moribund draft masquerading as a userspace page, which would have been deleted by G13 if it were a draft.-- 🌈WaltCip-( talk) 15:02, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I usually don't !vote delete on these types of userspace drafts, but the combination of the user's inactivity, the draft's age, and the SPA makes me lean delete, per Robert McClenon. — PerfectSoundWhatever ( t; c) 19:33, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.