- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was deleted. Daniel ( talk) 02:49, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Yet another cabal. Previously nominated and kept on the basis that it be improved. No chance in that happening, especially when the "CEO" Creamy3 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) has been indef. blocked for trolling and for threats. seicer | talk | contribs 15:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Given the recent deletions of "cabals" with better track records than this one, delete this. — Scien tizzle 16:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Scientizzle. We're setting precedent for deleting the more useless cabals, and this one even more so since the creator has been banned. Glass Cobra 19:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'd also support blocking. It looks like these are all SPAs, or meatpuppets at the very least. We should probably run it through WP:SSP to be sure, though. Glass Cobra 20:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, banned creator, cabel posts have been disruptive, cabel membership seems to ecourage isolation from wonted Wikipedia policies and practices (never mind civility). Gwen Gale ( talk) 20:04, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Strong delete as borderline trolling. I'm thisclose to blocking all the members as socks of Creamy3 ...
none of the other users have any contributions aside from this page.Blueboy 96 20:30, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- I take that back, there's some constructive contributions there--but my sock detector is still going crazy. Blueboy 96 20:39, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Strong delete as trolling; and would support blocking all the others as evident socks or meatpuppets of #3. -- Orange Mike | Talk 20:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as trolling, and also support blocking all the others, they appear to be socks judging by their contributions. KnightLago ( talk) 20:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Comment SSP case started at WP:SSP/Creamy3. Feel free to fill in any gaps I may have missed--I'd have filed a checkuser, but some of their contribs are stale. Blueboy 96 20:53, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as it has been more disruptive than useful, and the user who created it is indef blocked; other related pages are, Wikipedia:WikiProject Creamys/Userbox, User:Creamy3/Creamy Army/Templates, User:Creamy3/Creamy Army/Templates/Banner, User:Creamy3/Creamy Army/Templates/Join, and User:Creamy3/Creamy Army/Templates/Userbox which should also be deleted. -- Snigbrook (talk) 21:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Tagged the lot for deletion as well. Blueboy 96 22:09, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: There is an existing thread on ANI about this. I decided originally not to block the remainder since many have been inactive for months, but on the same note, I see no reason not to. seicer | talk | contribs 21:57, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was deleted. Daniel ( talk) 02:49, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Yet another cabal. Previously nominated and kept on the basis that it be improved. No chance in that happening, especially when the "CEO" Creamy3 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) has been indef. blocked for trolling and for threats. seicer | talk | contribs 15:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Given the recent deletions of "cabals" with better track records than this one, delete this. — Scien tizzle 16:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Scientizzle. We're setting precedent for deleting the more useless cabals, and this one even more so since the creator has been banned. Glass Cobra 19:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'd also support blocking. It looks like these are all SPAs, or meatpuppets at the very least. We should probably run it through WP:SSP to be sure, though. Glass Cobra 20:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, banned creator, cabel posts have been disruptive, cabel membership seems to ecourage isolation from wonted Wikipedia policies and practices (never mind civility). Gwen Gale ( talk) 20:04, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Strong delete as borderline trolling. I'm thisclose to blocking all the members as socks of Creamy3 ...
none of the other users have any contributions aside from this page.Blueboy 96 20:30, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- I take that back, there's some constructive contributions there--but my sock detector is still going crazy. Blueboy 96 20:39, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Strong delete as trolling; and would support blocking all the others as evident socks or meatpuppets of #3. -- Orange Mike | Talk 20:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as trolling, and also support blocking all the others, they appear to be socks judging by their contributions. KnightLago ( talk) 20:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Comment SSP case started at WP:SSP/Creamy3. Feel free to fill in any gaps I may have missed--I'd have filed a checkuser, but some of their contribs are stale. Blueboy 96 20:53, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as it has been more disruptive than useful, and the user who created it is indef blocked; other related pages are, Wikipedia:WikiProject Creamys/Userbox, User:Creamy3/Creamy Army/Templates, User:Creamy3/Creamy Army/Templates/Banner, User:Creamy3/Creamy Army/Templates/Join, and User:Creamy3/Creamy Army/Templates/Userbox which should also be deleted. -- Snigbrook (talk) 21:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Tagged the lot for deletion as well. Blueboy 96 22:09, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: There is an existing thread on ANI about this. I decided originally not to block the remainder since many have been inactive for months, but on the same note, I see no reason not to. seicer | talk | contribs 21:57, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.