- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was keep. MER-C 12:32, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
This user page, for all intents and purposes, is empty. The user has all of 4 live edits (none in mainspace), and is inactive for the past five years. The username is also the real name of a person and thus this page appears as one of the top search results while searching the person's name. Partly because of that, this page has been a magnet for persistent vandalism until it was fully protected recently. Considering that the page is as good as empty, is there any need to do it an 'honour' with full protection? I suggets that we simply delete it. DL9C ( talk) 08:27, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: There is no honoring by protecting a page, only protecting it. Before the middle of last month, it received no vandalism for four years. The content there now is content the person put there. I see no reason to delete. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 14:55, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per SchreiberBike. BMK ( talk) 00:22, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, not violating any policies. Page protection is sufficient. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was keep. MER-C 12:32, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
This user page, for all intents and purposes, is empty. The user has all of 4 live edits (none in mainspace), and is inactive for the past five years. The username is also the real name of a person and thus this page appears as one of the top search results while searching the person's name. Partly because of that, this page has been a magnet for persistent vandalism until it was fully protected recently. Considering that the page is as good as empty, is there any need to do it an 'honour' with full protection? I suggets that we simply delete it. DL9C ( talk) 08:27, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: There is no honoring by protecting a page, only protecting it. Before the middle of last month, it received no vandalism for four years. The content there now is content the person put there. I see no reason to delete. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 14:55, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per SchreiberBike. BMK ( talk) 00:22, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, not violating any policies. Page protection is sufficient. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.