The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
There is so much wrong with this. Putting dead people on a list by what group they don't like is a little much, and lining them up with Hitler is over the top. No encyclopedic topic.
Legacypac (
talk)
02:15, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep, but merge to talk page of the relevant parent article. Not so indisputabley unsuitable.
WP:COATRACK implies care is required. Move all to a new section at
Talk:Anti-Serb sentiment. Spinout articles, especially possibly WP:NPOV issue spinout articles, should begin from the main article where interested editors can see what is happening. --
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
03:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
I think, abandoned material so closely related to an article, possibly partly suitable for inclusion in the article or as a spinout article, would in general be best merged to the article talk page. The policy supporting this would be
WP:PRESERVE. Is it agreeable for you to merge and redirecting these things to a talk page section, where appropriate? I don't anticipate objection from the talk page, but would be interested in hearing about it if it happens. --
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
05:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
You mean
here?. That would mean merge and redirect and make better effort at the target to record attribution (erring on the side of compliance). --
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
13:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
There is so much wrong with this. Putting dead people on a list by what group they don't like is a little much, and lining them up with Hitler is over the top. No encyclopedic topic.
Legacypac (
talk)
02:15, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep, but merge to talk page of the relevant parent article. Not so indisputabley unsuitable.
WP:COATRACK implies care is required. Move all to a new section at
Talk:Anti-Serb sentiment. Spinout articles, especially possibly WP:NPOV issue spinout articles, should begin from the main article where interested editors can see what is happening. --
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
03:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
I think, abandoned material so closely related to an article, possibly partly suitable for inclusion in the article or as a spinout article, would in general be best merged to the article talk page. The policy supporting this would be
WP:PRESERVE. Is it agreeable for you to merge and redirecting these things to a talk page section, where appropriate? I don't anticipate objection from the talk page, but would be interested in hearing about it if it happens. --
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
05:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
You mean
here?. That would mean merge and redirect and make better effort at the target to record attribution (erring on the side of compliance). --
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
13:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.