- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Keep. — xaosflux Talk 23:21, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
User:82.148.97.69
IP appears to be no longer in use. Delete or mark as historical. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 17:04, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- God does this take me back. According to this page the situation with Qatar and its IPv4 addresses has improved since 2009, to the point that each allocated address represents maybe ~200 individual broadband subscribers, but I think we should try to verify this first, even though there have been no edits by this IP since 2008 (which does kinda make the issue moot either way. — Ipatrol ( talk) 22:51, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep while updating it with accurate information, or applying a {{ historical}} if it can be shown that the information there was at one time true. — Godsy ( TALK CONT) 23:45, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Keep. — xaosflux Talk 23:21, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
User:82.148.97.69
IP appears to be no longer in use. Delete or mark as historical. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 17:04, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- God does this take me back. According to this page the situation with Qatar and its IPv4 addresses has improved since 2009, to the point that each allocated address represents maybe ~200 individual broadband subscribers, but I think we should try to verify this first, even though there have been no edits by this IP since 2008 (which does kinda make the issue moot either way. — Ipatrol ( talk) 22:51, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep while updating it with accurate information, or applying a {{ historical}} if it can be shown that the information there was at one time true. — Godsy ( TALK CONT) 23:45, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.