The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. RL0919 ( talk) 04:22, 6 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Template:User afh-0 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

An unused template for a constructed language that no one on Wikipedia apparently speaks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:20, 26 November 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete useless. CoolSkittle ( talk) 19:03, 26 November 2018 (UTC) reply
• Keep. Afrihili. The lack of use does not imply no one can speak this language. — SmokeyJoe ( talk) 21:07, 26 November 2018 (UTC) reply
  • I think the assumption that no one on Wikipedia speaks it comes from there being only a level-0 (I don't understand it or understand it with difficulty) template. -- Bsherr ( talk) 05:52, 27 November 2018 (UTC) reply
• Weak Keep - Once again, we are discussing getting rid of things simply because we don't know whether they do good. If no harm is done, no need to delete. Does it do harm? Robert McClenon ( talk) 08:31, 27 November 2018 (UTC) reply
• Keep It's unused, but a valid template for a legitimate constructed language. PrussianOwl ( talk) 18:55, 27 November 2018 (UTC) reply
• Keep. I agree with PrussianOwl. Unused isn't necessarily fatal, and I don't think it should be here. -- Bsherr ( talk) 22:24, 27 November 2018 (UTC) reply
• Keep per those above. I would not object to userfication, which is sometimes done for userboxes with no or few transclusions; see also WP:UBXNS. —  Godsy ^{( TALK} _CONT) 05:30, 29 November 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.