From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy Keep per discussion below, also nominator is on checkuserblock; without prejudice for any future good faith re-nominations. — xaosflux Talk 00:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Template:User Newpages with Twinkle

Template:User Newpages with Twinkle ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Its been deleted in the past due to the new user right, I expect they want it to still be deleted. All users should now apply for the New Page Reviewer right if they still want to patrol pages, as said by Yoshi24517. However, BU Rob13 has declined the CSD, making deletion become controversial. Userbox templates are discussed at MfD. 24.205.24.240 ( talk) 16:46, 5 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete. Its been deleted before, now it should be deleted again. Yoshi24517 Chat Online 03:51, 6 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Keep for many reasons.
  1. @ Yoshi24517: It was speedy deleted as per WP:G6, but this was not uncontroversial maintenance, so I've restored the previous revisions. The previous deletion was out-of-process.
  2. The new "new page reviewer" right does not prevent new page patrolling such as tagging, CSD noms, PRODs, etc. by new editors with Twinkle. Indeed, this was rejected strongly at the first RfC. It just prevents marking as patrolled by editors without the right.
  3. Even if it did restrict such new page patrolling, maybe "new page reviewers" wish to use a userbox indicating that they use Twinkle to do their patrolling.
  4. Even if that weren't the case, this userbox could be retained for historical purposes.
  5. The community has historically given a lot of leeway to userboxes unless they blatantly misrepresent policy or prove so divisive that they are a net negative.
~ Rob13 Talk 07:32, 6 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Keep The new user right doesn't necessarily prevent anyone from patrolling new pages with twinkle. (even though I have the right I still use twinkle to do patrolling because I find the curation tool clunky) -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 07:38, 6 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Eh, you are right. Can somebody close this as speedy keep? Yoshi24517 Chat Online 22:58, 6 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy Keep per discussion below, also nominator is on checkuserblock; without prejudice for any future good faith re-nominations. — xaosflux Talk 00:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Template:User Newpages with Twinkle

Template:User Newpages with Twinkle ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Its been deleted in the past due to the new user right, I expect they want it to still be deleted. All users should now apply for the New Page Reviewer right if they still want to patrol pages, as said by Yoshi24517. However, BU Rob13 has declined the CSD, making deletion become controversial. Userbox templates are discussed at MfD. 24.205.24.240 ( talk) 16:46, 5 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete. Its been deleted before, now it should be deleted again. Yoshi24517 Chat Online 03:51, 6 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Keep for many reasons.
  1. @ Yoshi24517: It was speedy deleted as per WP:G6, but this was not uncontroversial maintenance, so I've restored the previous revisions. The previous deletion was out-of-process.
  2. The new "new page reviewer" right does not prevent new page patrolling such as tagging, CSD noms, PRODs, etc. by new editors with Twinkle. Indeed, this was rejected strongly at the first RfC. It just prevents marking as patrolled by editors without the right.
  3. Even if it did restrict such new page patrolling, maybe "new page reviewers" wish to use a userbox indicating that they use Twinkle to do their patrolling.
  4. Even if that weren't the case, this userbox could be retained for historical purposes.
  5. The community has historically given a lot of leeway to userboxes unless they blatantly misrepresent policy or prove so divisive that they are a net negative.
~ Rob13 Talk 07:32, 6 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Keep The new user right doesn't necessarily prevent anyone from patrolling new pages with twinkle. (even though I have the right I still use twinkle to do patrolling because I find the curation tool clunky) -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 07:38, 6 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Eh, you are right. Can somebody close this as speedy keep? Yoshi24517 Chat Online 22:58, 6 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook