The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy keep. Appears this was nominated without understanding the process. Feel free to renominate if anyone feels it actually should be deleted. (non-admin closure) UnitedStatesian ( talk) 19:20, 26 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Talk:Factorial/Archive 1

Talk:Factorial/Archive 1 ( | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

This is not eligible for speedy deletion. Firstly, I fixed the signature of the user who is currently Jaimster~enwiki ( talk · contribs). Secondly, the threads were archived not purely based on age, but finer criteria. Incnis Mrsi ( talk) 17:51, 26 August 2019 (UTC) reply

• @ Incnis Mrsi: It kind of is eligible for speedy deletion per WP:G7. Also, Deacon Vorbis restored the archives to the main talk page anyways. I'm inclined to close this MFD if you don't have objections. – MJL  ‐Talk‐ ^☖ 18:05, 26 August 2019 (UTC) reply

  @ MJL: wait… I don’t request deletion, I contest Deacon_Vorbis’s speedy. Nobody evidently is willing to do the job I did with Talk:Factorial ( | subject | history | links | watch | logs). The deletion proposal is baseless. Incnis Mrsi ( talk) 18:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC) reply

@ Incnis Mrsi: You've nominated the archive for deletion here at MFD..? – MJL  ‐Talk‐ ^☖ 18:14, 26 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Let MJL tell me about the proper procedure of contesting a speedy deletion request. Doesn’t it fall back to regular deletion? Incnis Mrsi ( talk) 18:39, 26 August 2019 (UTC) reply

@ Incnis Mrsi: Well, in general you shouldn't contest a CSD if you are the page's creator. However, assuming that wasn't the case here (it kind of was; but it kind of wasn't), then it falls onto the person seeking deletion to nominate it here and make the case for it. Since you are not advocating for deletion here, then this would clearly fall as a Speedy keep. – MJL  ‐Talk‐ ^☖ 18:45, 26 August 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.