- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy Deleted, no content. -- kingboyk 16:33, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Portal:Yemen
Portal:Yemen ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) I suppose it's about time that this is deleted. The creator hasn't edited since January and the members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Yemen aren't really interested. It can be recreated if there is anyone who wants to maintain it, but, right now, there... isn't. Picaroon (Talk) 00:55, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Nothing at all is better than what's there now. YechielMan 01:20, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Whoa. Speedy delete per P1. Under P1, if the portal would be subject to speedy deletion as an article, it qualifies, and it would fit A3 if it were an article. -- Core desat 02:16, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as empty. So tagged. MER-C 08:23, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy Deleted, no content. -- kingboyk 16:33, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Portal:Yemen
Portal:Yemen ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) I suppose it's about time that this is deleted. The creator hasn't edited since January and the members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Yemen aren't really interested. It can be recreated if there is anyone who wants to maintain it, but, right now, there... isn't. Picaroon (Talk) 00:55, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Nothing at all is better than what's there now. YechielMan 01:20, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Whoa. Speedy delete per P1. Under P1, if the portal would be subject to speedy deletion as an article, it qualifies, and it would fit A3 if it were an article. -- Core desat 02:16, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as empty. So tagged. MER-C 08:23, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.