From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . Proper Prior Planning Prevents Piss Poor Portals like this one. ♠ PMC(talk) 05:52, 13 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Portal:Urinary system

Portal:Urinary system ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

a piss poor very specific portal topic. 50% chance of getting the first image repeated on the lower right. The selected articles also repeat images. Mainspace page does a much better job of covering the topic and linking to related topics. Topic fails Wikipedia:Portal/Guidelines "portals should be about broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers." If readers wanted short snippets of data Portal space would be popular instead of article space where the real deal is. Legacypac ( talk) 10:40, 3 March 2019 (UTC) reply

  • Delete but can we slow down the tagging of the portals, now that a mass-deletion is being discussed? Robert McClenon ( talk) 00:11, 4 March 2019 (UTC) reply
I tagged some more in diverse topics after the allegation the first ones nominaed were not representative. This one is a typical biology topic. Legacypac ( talk) 00:22, 4 March 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . Proper Prior Planning Prevents Piss Poor Portals like this one. ♠ PMC(talk) 05:52, 13 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Portal:Urinary system

Portal:Urinary system ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

a piss poor very specific portal topic. 50% chance of getting the first image repeated on the lower right. The selected articles also repeat images. Mainspace page does a much better job of covering the topic and linking to related topics. Topic fails Wikipedia:Portal/Guidelines "portals should be about broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers." If readers wanted short snippets of data Portal space would be popular instead of article space where the real deal is. Legacypac ( talk) 10:40, 3 March 2019 (UTC) reply

  • Delete but can we slow down the tagging of the portals, now that a mass-deletion is being discussed? Robert McClenon ( talk) 00:11, 4 March 2019 (UTC) reply
I tagged some more in diverse topics after the allegation the first ones nominaed were not representative. This one is a typical biology topic. Legacypac ( talk) 00:22, 4 March 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook