The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Never paid much attention to portals before, but I have to say that this is the sort of nomination that needs much more information. How do you measure life and death in a portal? Surely "Trucks" is a fairly stable thing. The existence of red links is not normally a reason for deletion. In fact, red links have been considered a good thing for inviting newcomers to help build the project. --
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
23:47, 17 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete Redlinks in articles can be good things, because they encourage people to write another article to make WP's coverage better. Portals, however, are meant to showcase our existing articles, and the redlinks here just show that the task of completing the portal was never finished. There shouldn't be redlinks to the "selected article archives", for example, nor for entire missing sections such as selected picture and DYK.
BencherliteTalk01:01, 24 June 2011 (UTC)reply
It was created less than a year ago, it's a suitable topic for a portal, and there are not many red links there. It would be easier to complete this than to start a new one just because a few pages are missing.
Peter E. James (
talk)
06:48, 27 June 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Never paid much attention to portals before, but I have to say that this is the sort of nomination that needs much more information. How do you measure life and death in a portal? Surely "Trucks" is a fairly stable thing. The existence of red links is not normally a reason for deletion. In fact, red links have been considered a good thing for inviting newcomers to help build the project. --
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
23:47, 17 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete Redlinks in articles can be good things, because they encourage people to write another article to make WP's coverage better. Portals, however, are meant to showcase our existing articles, and the redlinks here just show that the task of completing the portal was never finished. There shouldn't be redlinks to the "selected article archives", for example, nor for entire missing sections such as selected picture and DYK.
BencherliteTalk01:01, 24 June 2011 (UTC)reply
It was created less than a year ago, it's a suitable topic for a portal, and there are not many red links there. It would be easier to complete this than to start a new one just because a few pages are missing.
Peter E. James (
talk)
06:48, 27 June 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.