The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was
Speedy deleted per CSD-P2 - Portal lacking required supporting articles.
bd2412T 01:40, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
This game hasn t enough notability to get more than one article about it in Wikipedia, so the portal is useless
Ksempac 20:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete - it was certainly made in good faith, but this sort of thing is better for an external wiki. Not large enough scope for encyclopedic content.
GracenotesT § 21:48, 10 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete There is no need for a portal/WikiProject to be about every article in Wikipedia, this is similar to making a portal about GTA:San Andreas, the scope would just be to small if created and for the portal in discussion, it is just too small. Best Regards -
Tellyaddict (
Talk) 18:13, 11 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete We don't need a portal on a conventional computer game, except if it is extremely famous and broad in contents.
Wooyi 21:16, 11 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Speedy deleteP2 (how often does that one come up?). I've tagged it as such. --
ais523 13:57, 12 March 2007 (
UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was
Speedy deleted per CSD-P2 - Portal lacking required supporting articles.
bd2412T 01:40, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
This game hasn t enough notability to get more than one article about it in Wikipedia, so the portal is useless
Ksempac 20:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete - it was certainly made in good faith, but this sort of thing is better for an external wiki. Not large enough scope for encyclopedic content.
GracenotesT § 21:48, 10 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete There is no need for a portal/WikiProject to be about every article in Wikipedia, this is similar to making a portal about GTA:San Andreas, the scope would just be to small if created and for the portal in discussion, it is just too small. Best Regards -
Tellyaddict (
Talk) 18:13, 11 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete We don't need a portal on a conventional computer game, except if it is extremely famous and broad in contents.
Wooyi 21:16, 11 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Speedy deleteP2 (how often does that one come up?). I've tagged it as such. --
ais523 13:57, 12 March 2007 (
UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.