- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 01:06, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Portal:The Sims
This nomination includes: Portal:The Sims, its subpages, Portal:Sims (redirect w/ history), and its subpages.
Unmaintained, narrow scope, portal.
Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/The Sims used to manage it, but they are long since defunct.
I partially
revived it today from it's pre-automated state (
banner and all), but I have no intention of maintaining it. This is the portal at its arguable best, and it does not add much content whatsoever. –
MJL
‐Talk‐
☖ 17:33, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, along with all subpages. WP:POG says that portals should be about "broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers".
- This one illustrates again why that principle is important. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 17:42, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete part of the cleanup that should have happened post WP:ENDPORTALS Legacypac ( talk) 05:25, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - Old portal, 33 subpages, created 2008-04-06 13:11:26 by User:ConnorJack. A comment by a maintainer, if any, could make the day. Portal:The Sims. Pldx1 ( talk) 15:34, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - A questionable portal from its inception. Not a broad focus. Originated by now-inactive users. As specified by above editors. Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:17, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 01:06, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Portal:The Sims
This nomination includes: Portal:The Sims, its subpages, Portal:Sims (redirect w/ history), and its subpages.
Unmaintained, narrow scope, portal.
Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/The Sims used to manage it, but they are long since defunct.
I partially
revived it today from it's pre-automated state (
banner and all), but I have no intention of maintaining it. This is the portal at its arguable best, and it does not add much content whatsoever. –
MJL
‐Talk‐
☖ 17:33, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, along with all subpages. WP:POG says that portals should be about "broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers".
- This one illustrates again why that principle is important. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 17:42, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete part of the cleanup that should have happened post WP:ENDPORTALS Legacypac ( talk) 05:25, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - Old portal, 33 subpages, created 2008-04-06 13:11:26 by User:ConnorJack. A comment by a maintainer, if any, could make the day. Portal:The Sims. Pldx1 ( talk) 15:34, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - A questionable portal from its inception. Not a broad focus. Originated by now-inactive users. As specified by above editors. Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:17, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.