From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Tikiwont ( talk) 09:27, 10 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Portal:Suriname

Incomplete portal, made over a year ago and the only content is the introduction B ( talk) 06:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. As with Portal:Burma, the topic behind this portal has potential, but no one seems to be interested in developing it beyond a stub. At this level of detail, a reader's much better served by the main article. Zetawoof( ζ) 02:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Agree with above. -- Just my 2 cents -- Hemanshu ( talk) 12:15, 5 February 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Delete I am in agreement with the nominator. Pastor Theo ( talk) 12:12, 7 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Tikiwont ( talk) 09:27, 10 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Portal:Suriname

Incomplete portal, made over a year ago and the only content is the introduction B ( talk) 06:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. As with Portal:Burma, the topic behind this portal has potential, but no one seems to be interested in developing it beyond a stub. At this level of detail, a reader's much better served by the main article. Zetawoof( ζ) 02:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Agree with above. -- Just my 2 cents -- Hemanshu ( talk) 12:15, 5 February 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Delete I am in agreement with the nominator. Pastor Theo ( talk) 12:12, 7 February 2009 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook