The result of the discussion was: delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:09, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Portal:Sony was the least-viewed of the 6 portals that were kept in the Mixed Bag nomination, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Mixed bag of group portals. It is also an abandoned never-developed mini-portal. It was procedurally kept, but the closer noted that it may be renominated. During the Jan-Feb 2019 period, the portal had 11 daily pageviews, as contrasted with 3466 for Sony. The viewing of the portal increased on April 22 due to the increased attention to portals, and for the Jan-Jun 2019 period, there were 31 daily pageviews, as contrasted with 3268 for Sony, still less than 1% of the views for the article. The portal was developed in 2008, and its originator has been inactive since 2008, but the portal has never had a variety of articles, only a phone, an article, a console, and a tablet. The portal provides nothing that is not also available via the article, except possibly the teaser that a viewer might think it provides something. It also relies on the architectural failure of subpages that are partial copies of pages. This is a stillborn portal. Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:29, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:09, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Portal:Sony was the least-viewed of the 6 portals that were kept in the Mixed Bag nomination, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Mixed bag of group portals. It is also an abandoned never-developed mini-portal. It was procedurally kept, but the closer noted that it may be renominated. During the Jan-Feb 2019 period, the portal had 11 daily pageviews, as contrasted with 3466 for Sony. The viewing of the portal increased on April 22 due to the increased attention to portals, and for the Jan-Jun 2019 period, there were 31 daily pageviews, as contrasted with 3268 for Sony, still less than 1% of the views for the article. The portal was developed in 2008, and its originator has been inactive since 2008, but the portal has never had a variety of articles, only a phone, an article, a console, and a tablet. The portal provides nothing that is not also available via the article, except possibly the teaser that a viewer might think it provides something. It also relies on the architectural failure of subpages that are partial copies of pages. This is a stillborn portal. Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:29, 25 July 2019 (UTC)