- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. — xaosflux Talk 22:29, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Portal:Singularity
A sole and relatively unknown theory is hardly a subject for a portal. cj | talk 07:05, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete because it's unmaintained. There may be enough content to sustain such a portal, with biographies of leading figures, major organisations, the philosophical concepts, the various technologies that might lead up to it, some of the science fiction that's been written about it. It wouldn't be hard to get a list of 20 or so articles on the subject, although many of those articles might not be well developed. Delete it quickly, but without prejudice, before I get carried away and volunteer to maintain it.- gadfium 08:35, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - not a portal topic. BD2412 T 16:11, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I question the suggestion that this is a "relatively unknown" theory, but the current framework appears pathetic, and I cannot see the case for portal maintainability. Xoloz 23:36, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per gadfium and Xoloz. Barno 14:28, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per everyone above. Jet Engines 13:12, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. — xaosflux Talk 22:29, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Portal:Singularity
A sole and relatively unknown theory is hardly a subject for a portal. cj | talk 07:05, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete because it's unmaintained. There may be enough content to sustain such a portal, with biographies of leading figures, major organisations, the philosophical concepts, the various technologies that might lead up to it, some of the science fiction that's been written about it. It wouldn't be hard to get a list of 20 or so articles on the subject, although many of those articles might not be well developed. Delete it quickly, but without prejudice, before I get carried away and volunteer to maintain it.- gadfium 08:35, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - not a portal topic. BD2412 T 16:11, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I question the suggestion that this is a "relatively unknown" theory, but the current framework appears pathetic, and I cannot see the case for portal maintainability. Xoloz 23:36, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per gadfium and Xoloz. Barno 14:28, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per everyone above. Jet Engines 13:12, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.