- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Greeves ( talk • contribs) 00:43, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Portal:Sheryl Crow
Relisting portal as per conclusion of previous multiple portal deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Britney Spears. John Carter ( talk) 21:23, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - on the basis of seemingly having insufficient Start class or better articles for a portal. John Carter ( talk) 21:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep. Give it a few more months and let's see what progress it has made by that time. Obuibo Mbstpo ( talk) 17:32, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Per my arguments in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Britney Spears, this topic is not broad enough and not featured enough on Wikipedia. And it seems that there is consensus that a portal should satisfy at least one of these requirements. Moreover, this portal is unlikely to be updated regularly. Cenarium ( talk) 18:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Per Cenarium - too narrow and under-maintained. Johnbod ( talk) 19:57, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Greeves ( talk • contribs) 00:43, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Portal:Sheryl Crow
Relisting portal as per conclusion of previous multiple portal deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Britney Spears. John Carter ( talk) 21:23, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - on the basis of seemingly having insufficient Start class or better articles for a portal. John Carter ( talk) 21:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep. Give it a few more months and let's see what progress it has made by that time. Obuibo Mbstpo ( talk) 17:32, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Per my arguments in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Britney Spears, this topic is not broad enough and not featured enough on Wikipedia. And it seems that there is consensus that a portal should satisfy at least one of these requirements. Moreover, this portal is unlikely to be updated regularly. Cenarium ( talk) 18:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Per Cenarium - too narrow and under-maintained. Johnbod ( talk) 19:57, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.