- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Hut 8.5 21:36, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Abandoned portal (cannot find any edits since January 2007) with little or no content. GW_Simulations User Page | Talk 22:42, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Essentially an underpopulated portal highly limited by its subject--too sparse to be of any use. I don't think it quite qualifies for P2 speedy deletion, but it's close. -- jonny- m t 15:22, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
- With nobody working on it and such a limited scope it probably has to go. (please list these portals at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Portals#Portals_for_deletion_at_MfD when nominating per the instructions above, thanks).-- Doug.( talk • contribs) 15:17, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
I agree there is nothing useful about having this article in its current state. It's confusing and not very useful. If someone needs the information it links to (which I might say is not much) then they can just search for it, not use this page. I say deletion Skeletor 0 ( talk) 00:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Hut 8.5 21:36, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Abandoned portal (cannot find any edits since January 2007) with little or no content. GW_Simulations User Page | Talk 22:42, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Essentially an underpopulated portal highly limited by its subject--too sparse to be of any use. I don't think it quite qualifies for P2 speedy deletion, but it's close. -- jonny- m t 15:22, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
- With nobody working on it and such a limited scope it probably has to go. (please list these portals at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Portals#Portals_for_deletion_at_MfD when nominating per the instructions above, thanks).-- Doug.( talk • contribs) 15:17, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
I agree there is nothing useful about having this article in its current state. It's confusing and not very useful. If someone needs the information it links to (which I might say is not much) then they can just search for it, not use this page. I say deletion Skeletor 0 ( talk) 00:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.