From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. —  JJMC89( T· C) 00:50, 7 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Portal:Rodeo

Portal:Rodeo ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

A woefully incomplete portal created in January 2019 that is presently not functional as a means to navigate topics. It is lacking too much content to qualify for existence at this time per WP:POG guidelines. North America 1000 22:08, 29 April 2019 (UTC) reply

  • Support The editor who created the portal also created an incomplete WikiProject Rodeo and performed other inconsistent actions. When consulted about the items, he had a temper tantrum basically, and announced he was leaving Wikipedia, which he has essentially done. I concur with removing the incomplete portal. I am an editor of all things rodeo since 2015. Thank you. dawnleelynn (talk) 22:20, 29 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Basically a non-portal, since it provides navigation to nowhere. The topic is probably to narrow to sustain a portal per WP:POG criterion that that portals should be about "broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers".
Good catch, @ Northamerica1000. It looks to me like someone was just testing the portal-creation template .. so do you think this qualifies for WP:G2 speedy deletion as a test page? -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 23:49, 29 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Since it looks like a real portal, it isn't an obvious G2, but it looks like a portal that doesn't do anything, and we are here, so delete. Robert McClenon ( talk) 00:58, 30 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. This seems to have been abandoned unfinished. No prejudice to recreation of a proper portal; I have no opinion on whether the topic would prove wide enough. I don't think any speedy category is applicable here. Espresso Addict ( talk) 06:40, 30 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Automated portal, 1 subpages, created 2019-01-17 22:47:19 by User:Kyerjay, useless navigation tool, redundant to the existing articles and navboxes, and of lower quality: Portal:Rodeo. Pldx1 ( talk) 15:14, 1 May 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. —  JJMC89( T· C) 00:50, 7 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Portal:Rodeo

Portal:Rodeo ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

A woefully incomplete portal created in January 2019 that is presently not functional as a means to navigate topics. It is lacking too much content to qualify for existence at this time per WP:POG guidelines. North America 1000 22:08, 29 April 2019 (UTC) reply

  • Support The editor who created the portal also created an incomplete WikiProject Rodeo and performed other inconsistent actions. When consulted about the items, he had a temper tantrum basically, and announced he was leaving Wikipedia, which he has essentially done. I concur with removing the incomplete portal. I am an editor of all things rodeo since 2015. Thank you. dawnleelynn (talk) 22:20, 29 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Basically a non-portal, since it provides navigation to nowhere. The topic is probably to narrow to sustain a portal per WP:POG criterion that that portals should be about "broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers".
Good catch, @ Northamerica1000. It looks to me like someone was just testing the portal-creation template .. so do you think this qualifies for WP:G2 speedy deletion as a test page? -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 23:49, 29 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Since it looks like a real portal, it isn't an obvious G2, but it looks like a portal that doesn't do anything, and we are here, so delete. Robert McClenon ( talk) 00:58, 30 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. This seems to have been abandoned unfinished. No prejudice to recreation of a proper portal; I have no opinion on whether the topic would prove wide enough. I don't think any speedy category is applicable here. Espresso Addict ( talk) 06:40, 30 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Automated portal, 1 subpages, created 2019-01-17 22:47:19 by User:Kyerjay, useless navigation tool, redundant to the existing articles and navboxes, and of lower quality: Portal:Rodeo. Pldx1 ( talk) 15:14, 1 May 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook