- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep. — xaosflux Talk 11:11, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Portal:Piracy
No editors update the portal regularly. I used to, but do not have much time to contribute. It also does not have any readers. It was also mentioned here at WP:Piracy. Deflagro C/ T 20:25, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Could we tag this as "historical" or "unmaintained" or something? If someone wanted to write a portal on the subject there's enough here to get them started, and the topic is broad enough. Hut 8.5 21:19, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Keep as it could attract new editors who may want to start contributing. As mentioned some kind of tag or box added to the portal stating that it's not been maintained, etc.. Seems a shame to delete it when it has the potential to entice editors, after all WP:NOTPAPER Nk.sheridan Talk 22:07, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - portal could be changed to go onto automautic rotation, thus not needing regular human updating. John Carter ( talk) 00:23, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep and place a tag to direct interested users to WP:PIRACY -- Enric Naval ( talk) 02:54, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - It looks like WikiProject Piracy is gaining at least a few new members every month. At some point soon, one of them will likely "seize the portal" and make something of it. It happened to the Time Portal. - Yamara ✉ 14:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- KeepI think the page could be good for something. -- LAA Fan 19:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep It looks like new members are still joining the WikiProject, so that in itself should not mean that it should be deleted at this time. Razor flame 23:50, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep. — xaosflux Talk 11:11, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Portal:Piracy
No editors update the portal regularly. I used to, but do not have much time to contribute. It also does not have any readers. It was also mentioned here at WP:Piracy. Deflagro C/ T 20:25, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Could we tag this as "historical" or "unmaintained" or something? If someone wanted to write a portal on the subject there's enough here to get them started, and the topic is broad enough. Hut 8.5 21:19, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Keep as it could attract new editors who may want to start contributing. As mentioned some kind of tag or box added to the portal stating that it's not been maintained, etc.. Seems a shame to delete it when it has the potential to entice editors, after all WP:NOTPAPER Nk.sheridan Talk 22:07, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - portal could be changed to go onto automautic rotation, thus not needing regular human updating. John Carter ( talk) 00:23, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep and place a tag to direct interested users to WP:PIRACY -- Enric Naval ( talk) 02:54, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - It looks like WikiProject Piracy is gaining at least a few new members every month. At some point soon, one of them will likely "seize the portal" and make something of it. It happened to the Time Portal. - Yamara ✉ 14:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- KeepI think the page could be good for something. -- LAA Fan 19:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep It looks like new members are still joining the WikiProject, so that in itself should not mean that it should be deleted at this time. Razor flame 23:50, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.