The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 01:24, 21 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Abandoned micro-portal (one article, one bio, one picture) on the 19th most-populated province of the the Philippines, thus failing the
WP:POG guideline's breadth-of-subject-area requirement.
UnitedStatesian (
talk) 00:21, 14 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete:
7 daily page views for portal; 206 daily page views for article
Another heritage portal by a now-inactive editor
This appears to be a first-level administrative subdivision, so delete without prejudice.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 00:51, 14 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete If that's for good! I was busy in the last few years that updating the portal regularly may no longer be posible.
Emaniuz (
talk) 09:09, 15 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete: abandoned and far too narrow scope. SITH(talk) 11:59, 17 May 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 01:24, 21 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Abandoned micro-portal (one article, one bio, one picture) on the 19th most-populated province of the the Philippines, thus failing the
WP:POG guideline's breadth-of-subject-area requirement.
UnitedStatesian (
talk) 00:21, 14 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete:
7 daily page views for portal; 206 daily page views for article
Another heritage portal by a now-inactive editor
This appears to be a first-level administrative subdivision, so delete without prejudice.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 00:51, 14 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete If that's for good! I was busy in the last few years that updating the portal regularly may no longer be posible.
Emaniuz (
talk) 09:09, 15 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete: abandoned and far too narrow scope. SITH(talk) 11:59, 17 May 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.