- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep. — xaosflux Talk 00:12, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Portal:NATO
Unfinished portal not updated since March/September 2006. feydey 05:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Weak delete If it's going to languish forever in its present form, I say delete; but I could easily be swayed to keep if someone took a half hour to clean up this mess. Shalom Hello 03:29, 26 August 2007 (UTC)- Changed to keep. Neranei informed me that she cleaned up the portal, and she did a fine job. Shalom Hello 18:59, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep - I spent some time revamping and updating this portal, and I will update it at least once a week. Neranei (talk) 18:55, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - alternately, you could set it up for automatic rotation, which would allow you to set up weeks or months in advance. John Carter 19:52, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Now that it has been fixed, definitely keep. By the way, there is also the possibility of adding a Show New Selections button so instead of having to update so regularly, you could have a Randomly rotating selection of content. See Portal:Roman Empire for example. By the way, my compliments to the Chef in the fix up work. -- Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor ( tαlk) 02:44, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep. — xaosflux Talk 00:12, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Portal:NATO
Unfinished portal not updated since March/September 2006. feydey 05:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Weak delete If it's going to languish forever in its present form, I say delete; but I could easily be swayed to keep if someone took a half hour to clean up this mess. Shalom Hello 03:29, 26 August 2007 (UTC)- Changed to keep. Neranei informed me that she cleaned up the portal, and she did a fine job. Shalom Hello 18:59, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep - I spent some time revamping and updating this portal, and I will update it at least once a week. Neranei (talk) 18:55, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - alternately, you could set it up for automatic rotation, which would allow you to set up weeks or months in advance. John Carter 19:52, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Now that it has been fixed, definitely keep. By the way, there is also the possibility of adding a Show New Selections button so instead of having to update so regularly, you could have a Randomly rotating selection of content. See Portal:Roman Empire for example. By the way, my compliments to the Chef in the fix up work. -- Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor ( tαlk) 02:44, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.