- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux Talk 23:21, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Portal:Munich
| All prior XfDs for this page: |
This portal was created on 23 March 2007 by a Kingjeff ( talk · contribs). After a two-year abandonment, it was nominated for deletion by B. That nomination closed with no consensus. Agathoclea made it into a redirect to Portal:Bavaria with a commitment to continue working on the portal.
Fast forward 10 years later, and here we are. TTH began the process of automating it (13 July 2018). As with other related nominations today, it was made to select content from Outline of Munich.
I temporarily restored the redirect per WP:WOOD, but that did not sit well with me. The previous MfD included a statement by Tikiwont that this could be revisited later. I figured now is as good of a time as any.
This portal has sat abandoned for nearly ten years. No maintainers have come forward in that time, but I leave open the possibility future maintainers may be found as this sizeable city certainly meets
WP:POG.
I therefore propose this portal be deleted without prejudice to its recreation at a later date following whatever future consensus may be in place for portal content. –
MJL
‐Talk‐
☖ 16:28, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment. Related pending nomination: MFD:City portals cloned from outline pages by BrownHairedGirl – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 16:31, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. The old abandoned version was broken, so the 2009 redirection [1] was a good idea.
- The re-creation in 2019 by TTH just made it an automated clone of Outline of Munich, which is redundant for the reasons which I set out in WP:Miscellany for deletion/City portals cloned from outline pages. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 16:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Concur with analysis by MJL and by BHG. Portal has 3 average daily pageviews, as opposed to 3059 for city article. Robert McClenon ( talk) 19:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment. I just found this portion of WP:WPPORT's newsletters, and I figured I should share it.
|
- In case anyone was curious how long it took to make these types of portals (or even why some were made). – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 18:09, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - Concludes with mumbo-jumbo. Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:21, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: per all the above. SITH (talk) 11:37, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - as bad as the previous one. Pldx1 ( talk) 14:03, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux Talk 23:21, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Portal:Munich
| All prior XfDs for this page: |
This portal was created on 23 March 2007 by a Kingjeff ( talk · contribs). After a two-year abandonment, it was nominated for deletion by B. That nomination closed with no consensus. Agathoclea made it into a redirect to Portal:Bavaria with a commitment to continue working on the portal.
Fast forward 10 years later, and here we are. TTH began the process of automating it (13 July 2018). As with other related nominations today, it was made to select content from Outline of Munich.
I temporarily restored the redirect per WP:WOOD, but that did not sit well with me. The previous MfD included a statement by Tikiwont that this could be revisited later. I figured now is as good of a time as any.
This portal has sat abandoned for nearly ten years. No maintainers have come forward in that time, but I leave open the possibility future maintainers may be found as this sizeable city certainly meets
WP:POG.
I therefore propose this portal be deleted without prejudice to its recreation at a later date following whatever future consensus may be in place for portal content. –
MJL
‐Talk‐
☖ 16:28, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment. Related pending nomination: MFD:City portals cloned from outline pages by BrownHairedGirl – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 16:31, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. The old abandoned version was broken, so the 2009 redirection [1] was a good idea.
- The re-creation in 2019 by TTH just made it an automated clone of Outline of Munich, which is redundant for the reasons which I set out in WP:Miscellany for deletion/City portals cloned from outline pages. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 16:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Concur with analysis by MJL and by BHG. Portal has 3 average daily pageviews, as opposed to 3059 for city article. Robert McClenon ( talk) 19:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment. I just found this portion of WP:WPPORT's newsletters, and I figured I should share it.
|
- In case anyone was curious how long it took to make these types of portals (or even why some were made). – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 18:09, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - Concludes with mumbo-jumbo. Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:21, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: per all the above. SITH (talk) 11:37, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - as bad as the previous one. Pldx1 ( talk) 14:03, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.