- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 14:36, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
One selected article and one bio that were last updated in July 2010. News section has been "under construction" since 2007. Mark Schierbecker ( talk) 07:35, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per the nom This portal has essentially been abandoned for over a decade and was never completed. It clearly fails WP:POG's requirement that portals should be about subjects broad enough to attract large numbers of steady maintainers and readers. This portal has had over a decade of no maintainers and it had an abysmal 11 views per day in June and July 2019 (despite the head article Montenegro having 5228 views per day in the same period). Portals stand or fall on their merits in the now, not what could someday hypothetically happen with them, and this one falls flat. I am strongly against allowing recreation, as over a decade of hard evidence shows Montenegro is not a broad enough topic to attract readers or maintainers. Newshunter12 ( talk) 17:53, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator and per @ Newshunter12. This is yet another a long-abandoned micro-portal. It should have been deleted long ago.
- I also oppose recreation. We have a decade's evidence that editors don't want to maintain this one. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 16:51, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nominator and NH12 analysis. An abandoned incomplete portal. Robert McClenon ( talk) 20:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 14:36, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
One selected article and one bio that were last updated in July 2010. News section has been "under construction" since 2007. Mark Schierbecker ( talk) 07:35, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per the nom This portal has essentially been abandoned for over a decade and was never completed. It clearly fails WP:POG's requirement that portals should be about subjects broad enough to attract large numbers of steady maintainers and readers. This portal has had over a decade of no maintainers and it had an abysmal 11 views per day in June and July 2019 (despite the head article Montenegro having 5228 views per day in the same period). Portals stand or fall on their merits in the now, not what could someday hypothetically happen with them, and this one falls flat. I am strongly against allowing recreation, as over a decade of hard evidence shows Montenegro is not a broad enough topic to attract readers or maintainers. Newshunter12 ( talk) 17:53, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator and per @ Newshunter12. This is yet another a long-abandoned micro-portal. It should have been deleted long ago.
- I also oppose recreation. We have a decade's evidence that editors don't want to maintain this one. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 16:51, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nominator and NH12 analysis. An abandoned incomplete portal. Robert McClenon ( talk) 20:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.