From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 04:25, 7 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Portal:Mexican Empire

It's not clear whether this was actually supposed to be a portal or a WikiProject... the point's moot, though, as there's no substantial content on the page, and the sole author has been indefinitely blocked. With no maintainer and no content worth preserving, there isn't much point in keeping this around. Zetawoof( ζ) 09:29, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply

as it happens, it was, 1821-23. See Mexican Empire DGG ( talk ) 22:31, 30 November 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Keep someone may wish to follow it up. It is a suitable group of topics. DGG ( talk ) 07:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC) reply
    • If anyone is interested in doing so, they are perfectly welcome to do so — deleting the current page should pose no obstacle to the portal's future recreation, as it isn't even a portal. Failing that, however, there's no point in preserving this in its present state. Zetawoof( ζ) 04:29, 2 December 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Delete without prejudice towards re-creation. A suitable group of topics, sure, but the fact remains that this is not a portal. User:TownDown apparently never managed to learn the difference between WikiProjects and portals before he was indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry. This obviously doesn't meet any of our portal guidelines. That said, if anyone wants to create a Mexican Empire portal or WikiProject in the future, I'd have no problem with it – provided that user understands the difference between the two. A Stop at Willoughby ( talk) 15:01, 1 December 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Delete for a portal, the scope seems pretty narrow. Gigs ( talk) 19:07, 2 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 04:25, 7 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Portal:Mexican Empire

It's not clear whether this was actually supposed to be a portal or a WikiProject... the point's moot, though, as there's no substantial content on the page, and the sole author has been indefinitely blocked. With no maintainer and no content worth preserving, there isn't much point in keeping this around. Zetawoof( ζ) 09:29, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply

as it happens, it was, 1821-23. See Mexican Empire DGG ( talk ) 22:31, 30 November 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Keep someone may wish to follow it up. It is a suitable group of topics. DGG ( talk ) 07:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC) reply
    • If anyone is interested in doing so, they are perfectly welcome to do so — deleting the current page should pose no obstacle to the portal's future recreation, as it isn't even a portal. Failing that, however, there's no point in preserving this in its present state. Zetawoof( ζ) 04:29, 2 December 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Delete without prejudice towards re-creation. A suitable group of topics, sure, but the fact remains that this is not a portal. User:TownDown apparently never managed to learn the difference between WikiProjects and portals before he was indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry. This obviously doesn't meet any of our portal guidelines. That said, if anyone wants to create a Mexican Empire portal or WikiProject in the future, I'd have no problem with it – provided that user understands the difference between the two. A Stop at Willoughby ( talk) 15:01, 1 December 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Delete for a portal, the scope seems pretty narrow. Gigs ( talk) 19:07, 2 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook