The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep- This is an unfair nomination. This is a copy-and-paste keep vote due to the large number of nominations stating I have reviewed these portal and believe it passes
WP:POG.--Happypillsjr✉00:01, 6 April 2019 (UTC)reply
What is unfair about my handcrafted nomination of pages you started? More time, effort and thought went into building this MFD then went into the one click wonder pages it seeks to delete.
Legacypac (
talk)
00:07, 6 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep McDonald's portal, delete others. Given the massive international popularity of McDonald's and the number of McDonald's-specific articles we have, there is very, very clearly enough scope for the McDonald's portal.
Lepricavark (
talk)
01:12, 6 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep
Portal:McDonald's – Passes
WP:POG with a diverse and large amount of content available on Wikipedia about the topic (e.g.
Category:McDonald's), and for having a sufficiently broad topical scope. After all, it's the largest restaurant chain in the world by revenue, and has restaurants in over 100 countries.North America100010:52, 6 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. McDonald's isn't a broad subject; fast food may be (and there is
Portal:Fast food - incidentally that lists about 90 related portals, but doesn't include McDonald's). Portals for specific companies (or people, for that matter) are generally a bad idea as they are likely to lead to continual battles as editors argue that their favorite brand "deserves" a portal. DexDor(talk)18:57, 6 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - McDonald's may be a large company but it is by no means a broad subject. A single company is just too narrow a topic for a portal to actually be useful and meaningful. Portals are supposed to help navigate very broad subjects - McDonald's doesn't need it - and these mass created portals are hardly helpful at all even if it needed one.
Meszzy2 (
talk)
07:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep- This is an unfair nomination. This is a copy-and-paste keep vote due to the large number of nominations stating I have reviewed these portal and believe it passes
WP:POG.--Happypillsjr✉00:01, 6 April 2019 (UTC)reply
What is unfair about my handcrafted nomination of pages you started? More time, effort and thought went into building this MFD then went into the one click wonder pages it seeks to delete.
Legacypac (
talk)
00:07, 6 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep McDonald's portal, delete others. Given the massive international popularity of McDonald's and the number of McDonald's-specific articles we have, there is very, very clearly enough scope for the McDonald's portal.
Lepricavark (
talk)
01:12, 6 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep
Portal:McDonald's – Passes
WP:POG with a diverse and large amount of content available on Wikipedia about the topic (e.g.
Category:McDonald's), and for having a sufficiently broad topical scope. After all, it's the largest restaurant chain in the world by revenue, and has restaurants in over 100 countries.North America100010:52, 6 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. McDonald's isn't a broad subject; fast food may be (and there is
Portal:Fast food - incidentally that lists about 90 related portals, but doesn't include McDonald's). Portals for specific companies (or people, for that matter) are generally a bad idea as they are likely to lead to continual battles as editors argue that their favorite brand "deserves" a portal. DexDor(talk)18:57, 6 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - McDonald's may be a large company but it is by no means a broad subject. A single company is just too narrow a topic for a portal to actually be useful and meaningful. Portals are supposed to help navigate very broad subjects - McDonald's doesn't need it - and these mass created portals are hardly helpful at all even if it needed one.
Meszzy2 (
talk)
07:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.