From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 00:33, 28 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Portal:Espionage

Portal:Espionage ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This portal hasn't been touched since 2006, and has no depth (the selected items don't change). There are two options. 1) Fill stuff in for this, or 2) scrap this portal and replace it with a Portal on Intelligence (intelligence services and all the things they do) overall, which has a broader scope, would be easier to fully fill, and would have a higher appeal. Another user brought the second idea to me, and I think it's the better one. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:51, 27 July 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 00:33, 28 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Portal:Espionage

Portal:Espionage ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This portal hasn't been touched since 2006, and has no depth (the selected items don't change). There are two options. 1) Fill stuff in for this, or 2) scrap this portal and replace it with a Portal on Intelligence (intelligence services and all the things they do) overall, which has a broader scope, would be easier to fully fill, and would have a higher appeal. Another user brought the second idea to me, and I think it's the better one. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:51, 27 July 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook