From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. нмŵוτн τ 21:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Portal:Einstein Family

Incomplete portal with only one section which appears to relate, evidently, to only four articles total, which is far too limited a scope for a portal. Creator of the comparatively recent portal is being notified of this discussion. It may be that the scope of the portal is supposed to be larger with later additions, but I think it is clearly disqualified based on the available evidence. John Carter ( talk) 17:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. Probably too narrow a subject for a portal. Perhaps the topic of his predecessors could be covered by a portal whose main subject is Albert? If such a portal exists, possibly merge to that portal, depending on if the maintainers of that other portal want it or not. — Scott5114 [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 21:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. нмŵוτн τ 21:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Portal:Einstein Family

Incomplete portal with only one section which appears to relate, evidently, to only four articles total, which is far too limited a scope for a portal. Creator of the comparatively recent portal is being notified of this discussion. It may be that the scope of the portal is supposed to be larger with later additions, but I think it is clearly disqualified based on the available evidence. John Carter ( talk) 17:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. Probably too narrow a subject for a portal. Perhaps the topic of his predecessors could be covered by a portal whose main subject is Albert? If such a portal exists, possibly merge to that portal, depending on if the maintainers of that other portal want it or not. — Scott5114 [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 21:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook