- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was keep Atmoz ( talk) 00:29, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Portal:Dragon Ball
This portal has been completely inactive since 2008, and no new updates for Selected Articles or Pictures for the Dragon Ball portal. JJ98 ( Talk) 17:07, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Unlike the Evangelion portal, this portal is pretty well developed. Therefore, it should be kept, perhaps marking it as {{ historical}} or other similar tag to signify that the portal is now inactive. — Farix ( t | c) 17:46, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Keep per TheFarix's reasoning. Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 20:52, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Keep and do not mark as historical per {{ historical}}'s description to not mark portals as such. It seems a bit pre-mature given its overall development to merge/delete this without seeing if there is interest in updating it first. 陣 内 Jinnai 18:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
- Keep for all the reasons given above. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 19:12, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
- Keep: I agree with TheFarix. -- FUNKAMATIC ~talk 03:33, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- Keep It has been inactive for two years, yes, but however quite well developed and there's a lot of content. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ( Contact) 17:41, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, obviously, since we don't delete portals simply because no-one's updated them for a while. The portal still functions for readers, which is the main point. Bencherlite Talk 20:29, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was keep Atmoz ( talk) 00:29, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Portal:Dragon Ball
This portal has been completely inactive since 2008, and no new updates for Selected Articles or Pictures for the Dragon Ball portal. JJ98 ( Talk) 17:07, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Unlike the Evangelion portal, this portal is pretty well developed. Therefore, it should be kept, perhaps marking it as {{ historical}} or other similar tag to signify that the portal is now inactive. — Farix ( t | c) 17:46, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Keep per TheFarix's reasoning. Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 20:52, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Keep and do not mark as historical per {{ historical}}'s description to not mark portals as such. It seems a bit pre-mature given its overall development to merge/delete this without seeing if there is interest in updating it first. 陣 内 Jinnai 18:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
- Keep for all the reasons given above. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 19:12, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
- Keep: I agree with TheFarix. -- FUNKAMATIC ~talk 03:33, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- Keep It has been inactive for two years, yes, but however quite well developed and there's a lot of content. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ( Contact) 17:41, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, obviously, since we don't delete portals simply because no-one's updated them for a while. The portal still functions for readers, which is the main point. Bencherlite Talk 20:29, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.