The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I think they are all outdated and misleading. If they are to be preserved as a record they should be marked as such. Not presented as part of the encyclopedia.
Rathfelder (
talk)
21:24, 21 March 2018 (UTC)reply
I don't understand is. I think most portals should be archived. This one gets over a hundred downloads per day, last three months, which does not sound like "obsolete". Why is it getting this hits? --
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
01:24, 22 March 2018 (UTC)reply
keep. If we wish to do away with indiciews, that should be done in a centralized discussion, probably in the form of an RfC, not here on MFD where comparatively few editors will see the discussion. Nor is "obselete" a valid reason for deleting a page, much less an entire portal. Wherre in the deletion policy is this given as a reason for deletion?
DES(talk)DESiegel Contribs02:51, 23 March 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I think they are all outdated and misleading. If they are to be preserved as a record they should be marked as such. Not presented as part of the encyclopedia.
Rathfelder (
talk)
21:24, 21 March 2018 (UTC)reply
I don't understand is. I think most portals should be archived. This one gets over a hundred downloads per day, last three months, which does not sound like "obsolete". Why is it getting this hits? --
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
01:24, 22 March 2018 (UTC)reply
keep. If we wish to do away with indiciews, that should be done in a centralized discussion, probably in the form of an RfC, not here on MFD where comparatively few editors will see the discussion. Nor is "obselete" a valid reason for deleting a page, much less an entire portal. Wherre in the deletion policy is this given as a reason for deletion?
DES(talk)DESiegel Contribs02:51, 23 March 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.