The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Speedy keep nominator presumably forgot to mention that this is a Featured Portal. If you see something that's out of date, fix it yourself or leave a message on the portal talk page. If you think that it no longer matches the Featured Portal criteria, nominate it for review. If you don't like the criteria, start a discussion to get them changed. If you don't like the portal namespace (which some of your comments elsewhere on the MFD page suggest), then start a discussion to close the namespace down. But unless and until you can show that any problems with this portal can only be solved by deleting it, deletion is not the answer here.
BencherliteTalk19:49, 16 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep Speedy keep - Disagreed, I have maintained this portal from the very beginning, and although it's true that I have never changed it, I've always made sure it is up-to-date. If there's something you'd like to see changed or added, just let me know or be bold and do it yourself. —
IJzeren JanUszkiełtu?20:30, 16 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Can you explain in more detail why you haven't worked on this since 2007? I am minded to say 'delete' but would like to understand your rationale before I decide. --Kleinzach01:22, 17 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep - Wikipedia articles and portals don't need to be constantly updated to be valid and encyclopedic. If this were the case, then likely over half of the articles would be removed from Wikipedia. Northamerica1000(talk)20:50, 16 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep - I agree with Northamerica1000. There is no rule that says portals must be edited often. Suggest TPH stop wasting everyone's time with these clearly meritless nominations.
ReykYO!03:13, 17 November 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Speedy keep nominator presumably forgot to mention that this is a Featured Portal. If you see something that's out of date, fix it yourself or leave a message on the portal talk page. If you think that it no longer matches the Featured Portal criteria, nominate it for review. If you don't like the criteria, start a discussion to get them changed. If you don't like the portal namespace (which some of your comments elsewhere on the MFD page suggest), then start a discussion to close the namespace down. But unless and until you can show that any problems with this portal can only be solved by deleting it, deletion is not the answer here.
BencherliteTalk19:49, 16 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep Speedy keep - Disagreed, I have maintained this portal from the very beginning, and although it's true that I have never changed it, I've always made sure it is up-to-date. If there's something you'd like to see changed or added, just let me know or be bold and do it yourself. —
IJzeren JanUszkiełtu?20:30, 16 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Can you explain in more detail why you haven't worked on this since 2007? I am minded to say 'delete' but would like to understand your rationale before I decide. --Kleinzach01:22, 17 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep - Wikipedia articles and portals don't need to be constantly updated to be valid and encyclopedic. If this were the case, then likely over half of the articles would be removed from Wikipedia. Northamerica1000(talk)20:50, 16 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep - I agree with Northamerica1000. There is no rule that says portals must be edited often. Suggest TPH stop wasting everyone's time with these clearly meritless nominations.
ReykYO!03:13, 17 November 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.