The result of the discussion was: keep . ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 22:26, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Far too narrow a scope for a portal: only 39 articles. A set with this low a number of pages is better served by a head article and a navbox. We already have both: Billy Idol and Template:Billy Idol. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 00:14, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
*Keep as per the consensus over at some Wikispace which I forgot where consensus was to keep these - I personally disagree with it but hey ho, If you want portals deleted then it might be worth reopening another RFC on it but as it stands keep pretty much per the rfc and above. –
Davey2010
Talk
01:20, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep . ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 22:26, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Far too narrow a scope for a portal: only 39 articles. A set with this low a number of pages is better served by a head article and a navbox. We already have both: Billy Idol and Template:Billy Idol. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 00:14, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
*Keep as per the consensus over at some Wikispace which I forgot where consensus was to keep these - I personally disagree with it but hey ho, If you want portals deleted then it might be worth reopening another RFC on it but as it stands keep pretty much per the rfc and above. –
Davey2010
Talk
01:20, 27 September 2018 (UTC)