The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Seems like there is some disagreement here on whether the topic is too narrow for the pertinent WP:POG guideline and whether another MFD can be cited as precedent. I am not seeing any clear cut consensus in either direction, other than the headcount which leans towards keep. This borders between "no consensus" and "keep", I'll play it as "no consensus" as it's not a particularly strong consensus. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 11:15, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Delete Portal covering a single product that I reverted from TTH's automated version to the original multi-subpage version having many, many subpages. The logic from the admin's closing statement in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Beyoncé is operative here: "the existence of lots of articles about a narrow topic does not make it a broad topic, it makes it a comprehensively covered narrow topic." and therefore this one is also contrary to the breadth-of-subject area requirements of the WP:POG guideline. There are 276 pages in scope, but none are FA and only one is GA, so fails the quality-of-content requirement of WP:POG. WikiProject is defunct. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 14:03, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Seems like there is some disagreement here on whether the topic is too narrow for the pertinent WP:POG guideline and whether another MFD can be cited as precedent. I am not seeing any clear cut consensus in either direction, other than the headcount which leans towards keep. This borders between "no consensus" and "keep", I'll play it as "no consensus" as it's not a particularly strong consensus. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 11:15, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Delete Portal covering a single product that I reverted from TTH's automated version to the original multi-subpage version having many, many subpages. The logic from the admin's closing statement in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Beyoncé is operative here: "the existence of lots of articles about a narrow topic does not make it a broad topic, it makes it a comprehensively covered narrow topic." and therefore this one is also contrary to the breadth-of-subject area requirements of the WP:POG guideline. There are 276 pages in scope, but none are FA and only one is GA, so fails the quality-of-content requirement of WP:POG. WikiProject is defunct. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 14:03, 5 May 2019 (UTC)