The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This portal that has not been touched since its initial creation in July. While there are three non-stub articles on this portal and thus it does not qualify for speedy deletion, there seems to be little hope for its success - the creator and only editor was blocked after an
arbitration hearing.
BigDT02:31, 22 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete per the above, with the reservation and because I personally think that the scope of the portal is too small to ever be able to make it a really useful portal. However, I reserve the right to change my opinion based on whether the members of the
WikiProject A Series of Unfortunate Events work to improve the portal over the course of this discussion.
Badbilltucker14:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Weak keep & update Right now it there seems no reason for it to be kept, but I think it has great potential if it starts to be regularly updated.
Pacaman!18:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This portal that has not been touched since its initial creation in July. While there are three non-stub articles on this portal and thus it does not qualify for speedy deletion, there seems to be little hope for its success - the creator and only editor was blocked after an
arbitration hearing.
BigDT02:31, 22 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete per the above, with the reservation and because I personally think that the scope of the portal is too small to ever be able to make it a really useful portal. However, I reserve the right to change my opinion based on whether the members of the
WikiProject A Series of Unfortunate Events work to improve the portal over the course of this discussion.
Badbilltucker14:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Weak keep & update Right now it there seems no reason for it to be kept, but I think it has great potential if it starts to be regularly updated.
Pacaman!18:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.