- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux Talk 23:43, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Portal:A-ha
Another portal on a single band that adds nothing to the article on the band. Readers can use the article to navigate to the band's songs and album pages much easier. Useless page created in a few seconds because creating portals that repackage existing articles in a less useful format is fun and easy. Legacypac ( talk) 20:28, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- comment "I don't know / what I'm to say / I will say it anyway / dee-late eet / delete it! cygnis insignis 20:56, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- Check out WP:NOTAVOTE. North America 1000 08:10, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- It bothers me that users have the idea this a worthwhile use of every one's time and consideration, and it is unsurprising that they feel set upon. The bullet point comment I just read, full of hyperbole and ominous predictions, is an insular view and clearly the advocates have been duped. It is a fearful response to the realisation that portals are only tolerated, and that the little tweaks and walls of discussion might be for nothing. It is cruel to continue condoning their refinement and creation, all of which is for what? Or is that, all for who? cygnis insignis 18:37, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete – Yet another narrow-focus portal created recently when creating portals has been fun and too easy. No reason to think that this one is needed. Yet another single-subject portal. Robert McClenon ( talk) 14:50, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- Weak keep as a competently made, self-maintaining portal with just about enough material to sustain it. Some readers may prefer its alternative view of the subject and there is little to be gained by deleting it. It's not a level 1 vital portal but nor does it scream Take me on / I'll be gone / In a day or two. Certes ( talk) 14:02, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This is a copy-and-paste keep vote due to the large number of nominations stating I have reviewed the portal and believe it passes WP:POG.
- Delete. An individual band is not a sufficiently broad topic. The reader's exploration and navigation of topics related to the main article is facilitated much better by the main article itself, the navbox, and related categories. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 20:18, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux Talk 23:43, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Portal:A-ha
Another portal on a single band that adds nothing to the article on the band. Readers can use the article to navigate to the band's songs and album pages much easier. Useless page created in a few seconds because creating portals that repackage existing articles in a less useful format is fun and easy. Legacypac ( talk) 20:28, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- comment "I don't know / what I'm to say / I will say it anyway / dee-late eet / delete it! cygnis insignis 20:56, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- Check out WP:NOTAVOTE. North America 1000 08:10, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- It bothers me that users have the idea this a worthwhile use of every one's time and consideration, and it is unsurprising that they feel set upon. The bullet point comment I just read, full of hyperbole and ominous predictions, is an insular view and clearly the advocates have been duped. It is a fearful response to the realisation that portals are only tolerated, and that the little tweaks and walls of discussion might be for nothing. It is cruel to continue condoning their refinement and creation, all of which is for what? Or is that, all for who? cygnis insignis 18:37, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete – Yet another narrow-focus portal created recently when creating portals has been fun and too easy. No reason to think that this one is needed. Yet another single-subject portal. Robert McClenon ( talk) 14:50, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- Weak keep as a competently made, self-maintaining portal with just about enough material to sustain it. Some readers may prefer its alternative view of the subject and there is little to be gained by deleting it. It's not a level 1 vital portal but nor does it scream Take me on / I'll be gone / In a day or two. Certes ( talk) 14:02, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This is a copy-and-paste keep vote due to the large number of nominations stating I have reviewed the portal and believe it passes WP:POG.
- Delete. An individual band is not a sufficiently broad topic. The reader's exploration and navigation of topics related to the main article is facilitated much better by the main article itself, the navbox, and related categories. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 20:18, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.