- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was moved to User:UBX/Pittsburgh Steelers. @ harej 22:50, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Template:User Pittsburgh Steelers
This is actually an interesting proposal, for two reasons. 1. It isn't me making the proposal. I just found the tagged userboxes and decided to complete this nomination. 2. This is a proposal to merge these three templates into one, not to delete all three of them. The original proposal was made in April 2009 and a discussion was initiated at Template talk:User Pittsburgh Steelers, but nobody ever replied. I have informed the original nominator of this discussion. Debresser ( talk) 22:42, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep I say that only because there are multiple userboxes for various things, why can't this be one of them? As far as there being no response on the talk page, perhaps nobody cares? ArcAngel ( talk) 22:59, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- Wrong Xfd this belongs here. Speedy close this one? Zoo Fari 23:37, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, userboxes belong here at MFD, regardless of namespace. talking birds 00:41, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Okey doke. Zoo Fari 01:41, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per ArcAngel's arguments. talking birds 00:41, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep This is very usable (not by me, Steelers suck. ;)). GrooveDog • oh hai 01:52, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
- Move all to userspace per Wikipedia:Userbox migration. These are templates about personal interests, so they don't belong in the Template namespace. However, there is no problem with having them as separate templates in the userspace. -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:26, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
- Concur with Userfication - don't have time to do the whole migration thing right now or I'd close and do it myself.-- Doug.( talk • contribs) 22:48, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was moved to User:UBX/Pittsburgh Steelers. @ harej 22:50, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Template:User Pittsburgh Steelers
This is actually an interesting proposal, for two reasons. 1. It isn't me making the proposal. I just found the tagged userboxes and decided to complete this nomination. 2. This is a proposal to merge these three templates into one, not to delete all three of them. The original proposal was made in April 2009 and a discussion was initiated at Template talk:User Pittsburgh Steelers, but nobody ever replied. I have informed the original nominator of this discussion. Debresser ( talk) 22:42, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep I say that only because there are multiple userboxes for various things, why can't this be one of them? As far as there being no response on the talk page, perhaps nobody cares? ArcAngel ( talk) 22:59, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- Wrong Xfd this belongs here. Speedy close this one? Zoo Fari 23:37, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, userboxes belong here at MFD, regardless of namespace. talking birds 00:41, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Okey doke. Zoo Fari 01:41, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per ArcAngel's arguments. talking birds 00:41, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep This is very usable (not by me, Steelers suck. ;)). GrooveDog • oh hai 01:52, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
- Move all to userspace per Wikipedia:Userbox migration. These are templates about personal interests, so they don't belong in the Template namespace. However, there is no problem with having them as separate templates in the userspace. -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:26, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
- Concur with Userfication - don't have time to do the whole migration thing right now or I'd close and do it myself.-- Doug.( talk • contribs) 22:48, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.