The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I know it's a default, but I still can't fathom an appropriate use on Wikipedia; it only becomes more ridiculous when you picture it on other MediaWiki installations, but I can't do anything about that.
Superm401 -
Talk04:23, 11 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep, hesitant to have something in that name space deleted, if noone can see where it is called from I'd suggest blanking it for a few weeks to make sure nothing breaks first.
xaosfluxTalk/CVU06:01, 11 February 2006 (UTC) (see below)reply
Comment. Okay, people obviously didn't read my comment above, which is understandable because it wasn't very readable (shouldn't edit while tired). Anyway..., typing RFC 10 or PMID 10 generates RFC 10 and
PMID10 respectively. That's the feature that the MediaWiki pages provide. It should obviously be replaced with fake interwiki links (like the bugzilla link above). Information about our interwiki links is at
Meta:Interwiki map. One for RFCs is already defined and a PMID one can be added. The only problem is fixing all the existing links, and a bot could make quick work of that.
Superm401 -
Talk20:40, 11 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Why should these be parsed automatically (and rather messily) when plenty of sites (like bugzilla and IMDB) are linked neatly through interwiki links?
Superm401 -
Talk00:28, 15 February 2006 (UTC)reply
These may be helpful for editors less knowlegeable with the interwiki system, AFAIK, using the interwiki system requires using editing codes and formats, plus knowlege of the interwiki link identifier. Casual editors are likely to comment about RFC 's, and readers may benefit from these links. I do agree that PMID would be useful in the meta interwikilinks though.
xaosfluxTalk/CVU01:04, 15 February 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I know it's a default, but I still can't fathom an appropriate use on Wikipedia; it only becomes more ridiculous when you picture it on other MediaWiki installations, but I can't do anything about that.
Superm401 -
Talk04:23, 11 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep, hesitant to have something in that name space deleted, if noone can see where it is called from I'd suggest blanking it for a few weeks to make sure nothing breaks first.
xaosfluxTalk/CVU06:01, 11 February 2006 (UTC) (see below)reply
Comment. Okay, people obviously didn't read my comment above, which is understandable because it wasn't very readable (shouldn't edit while tired). Anyway..., typing RFC 10 or PMID 10 generates RFC 10 and
PMID10 respectively. That's the feature that the MediaWiki pages provide. It should obviously be replaced with fake interwiki links (like the bugzilla link above). Information about our interwiki links is at
Meta:Interwiki map. One for RFCs is already defined and a PMID one can be added. The only problem is fixing all the existing links, and a bot could make quick work of that.
Superm401 -
Talk20:40, 11 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Why should these be parsed automatically (and rather messily) when plenty of sites (like bugzilla and IMDB) are linked neatly through interwiki links?
Superm401 -
Talk00:28, 15 February 2006 (UTC)reply
These may be helpful for editors less knowlegeable with the interwiki system, AFAIK, using the interwiki system requires using editing codes and formats, plus knowlege of the interwiki link identifier. Casual editors are likely to comment about RFC 's, and readers may benefit from these links. I do agree that PMID would be useful in the meta interwikilinks though.
xaosfluxTalk/CVU01:04, 15 February 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.