The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Salviogiuliano 23:07, 20 April 2023 (UTC)reply
This is misuse of draft space for promotion, and not a serious attempt to create a biography. No sources are cited, and a search makes it immediately obvious that independent in-depth coverage necessary to meet notability criteria cannot be found, as has been repeatedly pointed out to the article creator. Meanwhile, the draft has repeatedly
[1][2] been used to make unsourced claims about a third party who has no connection with the individual concerned, in contravention of
WP:BLP policy.
AndyTheGrump (
talk) 18:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete, fails to meet any criteria on
WP:BIO. The only independently produced content I can find about her is
this article that consists of summarizing her own content without providing any evidence that she would otherwise meet
WP:BIO. Stuart98 (
Talk •
Contribs) 00:04, 14 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete - this draft is an unsourced BLP and any sourcing that was in earlier versions were not about Leigh. Given the unsourced claims about another living person as noted in the nomination, this draft should be deleted versus the more usual treatment for drafts. --
Whpq (
talk) 02:33, 15 April 2023 (UTC)reply
She is helping to highlight porn addiction and how it destroys brains. <Redacted>. She is establishing a new neuroscience consensus on how porn damages the brain
Jm33746 (
talk) 21:58, 18 April 2023 (UTC)reply
The next time you violate
WP:BLP policy, I shall report the matter, and call for you to be blocked from editing.
AndyTheGrump (
talk) 22:56, 18 April 2023 (UTC)reply
They received their first warning in December 2020 about BLP violations. Guess they don’t care.
Equine-man (
talk) 17:02, 20 April 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Salviogiuliano 23:07, 20 April 2023 (UTC)reply
This is misuse of draft space for promotion, and not a serious attempt to create a biography. No sources are cited, and a search makes it immediately obvious that independent in-depth coverage necessary to meet notability criteria cannot be found, as has been repeatedly pointed out to the article creator. Meanwhile, the draft has repeatedly
[1][2] been used to make unsourced claims about a third party who has no connection with the individual concerned, in contravention of
WP:BLP policy.
AndyTheGrump (
talk) 18:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete, fails to meet any criteria on
WP:BIO. The only independently produced content I can find about her is
this article that consists of summarizing her own content without providing any evidence that she would otherwise meet
WP:BIO. Stuart98 (
Talk •
Contribs) 00:04, 14 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete - this draft is an unsourced BLP and any sourcing that was in earlier versions were not about Leigh. Given the unsourced claims about another living person as noted in the nomination, this draft should be deleted versus the more usual treatment for drafts. --
Whpq (
talk) 02:33, 15 April 2023 (UTC)reply
She is helping to highlight porn addiction and how it destroys brains. <Redacted>. She is establishing a new neuroscience consensus on how porn damages the brain
Jm33746 (
talk) 21:58, 18 April 2023 (UTC)reply
The next time you violate
WP:BLP policy, I shall report the matter, and call for you to be blocked from editing.
AndyTheGrump (
talk) 22:56, 18 April 2023 (UTC)reply
They received their first warning in December 2020 about BLP violations. Guess they don’t care.
Equine-man (
talk) 17:02, 20 April 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.