- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 13:22, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Draft:The most Simple Theory of Everything
Incomprehensible theory of everything based on original research.
To the extent that a reviewer with an education in chemistry can understand it, it is an effort to formulate a theory of everything by combining nineteenth-century concepts (no longer thought valid) with the seventeenth-century concept of Cartesian vortices, and combining technical words pseudo-randomly. Robert McClenon ( talk) 14:58, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - Author has been blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry. Robert McClenon ( talk) 01:42, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:FORUM. David.moreno72 01:59, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Every word. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 04:41, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Robert McClenon has summed up the situation perfectly. To call this original "research" is to flatter it. Much of it is original gobbledygook, and such parts of it as are comprehensible have precious little connection to any kind of meaningful science. Clearly an attempt to use Wikipedia to publicise the author's own non-notable ideas. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 21:45, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 13:22, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Draft:The most Simple Theory of Everything
Incomprehensible theory of everything based on original research.
To the extent that a reviewer with an education in chemistry can understand it, it is an effort to formulate a theory of everything by combining nineteenth-century concepts (no longer thought valid) with the seventeenth-century concept of Cartesian vortices, and combining technical words pseudo-randomly. Robert McClenon ( talk) 14:58, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - Author has been blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry. Robert McClenon ( talk) 01:42, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:FORUM. David.moreno72 01:59, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Every word. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 04:41, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Robert McClenon has summed up the situation perfectly. To call this original "research" is to flatter it. Much of it is original gobbledygook, and such parts of it as are comprehensible have precious little connection to any kind of meaningful science. Clearly an attempt to use Wikipedia to publicise the author's own non-notable ideas. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 21:45, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.