- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: redirect to Draft:The Inseparables (2023 film). BusterD ( talk) 20:17, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Draft:The Inseparables (2023)
-
Draft:The Inseparables (2023) (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) Notrealname1234 ( talk) 18:30, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Saved from the G13 dumpster in good faith minutes ago...until I was about to get it moved to its proper place. Ultimately more or less the same as what's already at the intended target page, Draft:The Inseperables (2023 film) (which is currently in the ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› AFC submission queue). Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 03:55, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect.
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
06:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- In draftspace, when you find content forks, redirect all to one. Maybe you should redirect all to the oldest, or redirect all to the best. The decision to redirect is cheap and easy, and easily undone if it was a mistake, unlike mfd, which is an expensive decision making process. SmokeyJoe ( talk) 06:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: While the system has logged me as the creator of this draft, that is a foible of the system. It seems to me that the history shows a mess. I offer no opinion, save that MfD is not usually the route to go with drafts, which either topple off at the 6 month time limit or are submitted for review. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 06:39, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to the article. Robert McClenon ( talk) 15:37, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment - I was about to suggest that maybe we need clearer
Before MFD instructions to minimize all of these good-faith nominations that should be redirects. But the nominator normally does not see the
before instructions, because nominations are usually made with Twinkle. So we just need to redirect these nominations.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
15:37, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- 1) I've read WP:BEFORE--before; and 2) handling draft duplicates is new to my WP experience (keep in mind I'm only a few months into my comeback; there's a reason I have {{ User oops}} in my userbox array). -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 08:58, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Notrealname1234 ( talk) 18:30, 18 July 2023 (UTC)- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: redirect to Draft:The Inseparables (2023 film). BusterD ( talk) 20:17, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Draft:The Inseparables (2023)
-
Draft:The Inseparables (2023) (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) Notrealname1234 ( talk) 18:30, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Saved from the G13 dumpster in good faith minutes ago...until I was about to get it moved to its proper place. Ultimately more or less the same as what's already at the intended target page, Draft:The Inseperables (2023 film) (which is currently in the ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› AFC submission queue). Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 03:55, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect.
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
06:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- In draftspace, when you find content forks, redirect all to one. Maybe you should redirect all to the oldest, or redirect all to the best. The decision to redirect is cheap and easy, and easily undone if it was a mistake, unlike mfd, which is an expensive decision making process. SmokeyJoe ( talk) 06:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: While the system has logged me as the creator of this draft, that is a foible of the system. It seems to me that the history shows a mess. I offer no opinion, save that MfD is not usually the route to go with drafts, which either topple off at the 6 month time limit or are submitted for review. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 06:39, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to the article. Robert McClenon ( talk) 15:37, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment - I was about to suggest that maybe we need clearer
Before MFD instructions to minimize all of these good-faith nominations that should be redirects. But the nominator normally does not see the
before instructions, because nominations are usually made with Twinkle. So we just need to redirect these nominations.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
15:37, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- 1) I've read WP:BEFORE--before; and 2) handling draft duplicates is new to my WP experience (keep in mind I'm only a few months into my comeback; there's a reason I have {{ User oops}} in my userbox array). -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 08:58, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Notrealname1234 ( talk) 18:30, 18 July 2023 (UTC)- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.