The result of the discussion was: delete. Nabla ( talk) 14:31, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
A vanity autobiography that would be nuked as WP:CSD#G11 if promoted to mainspace. An example: read the section on the Zika study. It describes a ground-breaking and important piece of research from 2016, supported by two press reports (which of course are based on press releases from the institution) and the paper itself, which is here: [1]. This ground-breaking paper has never been referenced. If you look at the Article Impact page and drill into the 760-odd reads of the paper from the US, fully a third of them geolocate to a single address, which is not an academic institution (in fact it appears likely to be a private address). There is blatant resume padding and WP:PEACOCK going on here. Guy ( Help!) 09:44, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Nabla ( talk) 14:31, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
A vanity autobiography that would be nuked as WP:CSD#G11 if promoted to mainspace. An example: read the section on the Zika study. It describes a ground-breaking and important piece of research from 2016, supported by two press reports (which of course are based on press releases from the institution) and the paper itself, which is here: [1]. This ground-breaking paper has never been referenced. If you look at the Article Impact page and drill into the 760-odd reads of the paper from the US, fully a third of them geolocate to a single address, which is not an academic institution (in fact it appears likely to be a private address). There is blatant resume padding and WP:PEACOCK going on here. Guy ( Help!) 09:44, 9 December 2016 (UTC)