- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 11:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
POV fork of Criticism of response to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic, which is heading towards deletion at AFD. Borderline attack page which inherently fails NPOV. b uidh e 20:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete or Move - The article title, which is currently a draft title, but a draft title is the title of a proposed article, is non-neutral. Not addressing content at this time, but we don't need an article with this title, and so don't need a draft with this title. Robert McClenon ( talk) 21:46, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete – a hopelessly non-neutral title for an article. If editors want to add information about mismanagement, add it to other articles where it can be mentioned alongside other information with due weight. — Granger ( talk · contribs) 00:23, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to Criticism of response to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic, and delete it if the target gets deleted. The redirect is on par with WP:SRE, it should be speedily done whenever someone accidentally forks in draftspace. Do the deletion as a WP:CSD#G8. The only possible purpose of this draft could be in merging to the target. — SmokeyJoe ( talk) 09:33, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete or Redirect to Criticism of response to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic -- ChaTo ( talk) 13:09, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. If the Criticism article is kept, this could be created as a redirect but it would immediately be tagged as a R from non-neutral name. Same if there were a Controversy or Conspiracy redirect. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 22:45, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete – Non-neutral title and tone. Kind Tennis Fan ( talk) 23:11, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. POVFORK of an article that is already questionable, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of response to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. -- MarioGom ( talk) 10:05, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Colds are renowned to be incurable. Suddenly calling it "Mismanagement" is pretty bold. Iluvalar ( talk) 15:41, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. The title is inherently non-NPOV. The tone is questionable. Due to the problematic title, I believe that a redirect is inappropriate. Karlshammar ( talk) 18:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per above. In addition to being NPOV, the topic seems overly broad. Averell ( talk) 09:01, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Politics should not have anything to do with COVID-19, let Shiff do his only job, trying to impeach. 2A00:1370:812C:9562:3073:140:AA00:A551 ( talk) 03:12, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 11:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
POV fork of Criticism of response to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic, which is heading towards deletion at AFD. Borderline attack page which inherently fails NPOV. b uidh e 20:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete or Move - The article title, which is currently a draft title, but a draft title is the title of a proposed article, is non-neutral. Not addressing content at this time, but we don't need an article with this title, and so don't need a draft with this title. Robert McClenon ( talk) 21:46, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete – a hopelessly non-neutral title for an article. If editors want to add information about mismanagement, add it to other articles where it can be mentioned alongside other information with due weight. — Granger ( talk · contribs) 00:23, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to Criticism of response to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic, and delete it if the target gets deleted. The redirect is on par with WP:SRE, it should be speedily done whenever someone accidentally forks in draftspace. Do the deletion as a WP:CSD#G8. The only possible purpose of this draft could be in merging to the target. — SmokeyJoe ( talk) 09:33, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete or Redirect to Criticism of response to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic -- ChaTo ( talk) 13:09, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. If the Criticism article is kept, this could be created as a redirect but it would immediately be tagged as a R from non-neutral name. Same if there were a Controversy or Conspiracy redirect. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 22:45, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete – Non-neutral title and tone. Kind Tennis Fan ( talk) 23:11, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. POVFORK of an article that is already questionable, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of response to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. -- MarioGom ( talk) 10:05, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Colds are renowned to be incurable. Suddenly calling it "Mismanagement" is pretty bold. Iluvalar ( talk) 15:41, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. The title is inherently non-NPOV. The tone is questionable. Due to the problematic title, I believe that a redirect is inappropriate. Karlshammar ( talk) 18:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per above. In addition to being NPOV, the topic seems overly broad. Averell ( talk) 09:01, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Politics should not have anything to do with COVID-19, let Shiff do his only job, trying to impeach. 2A00:1370:812C:9562:3073:140:AA00:A551 ( talk) 03:12, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.