The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I still don’t believe this program is notable enough to be included in mainspace. The draft looks a sort of finished and so it is unlikely that further development will make it more notable. So, the right course of action is to discontinue the development by deletion. —-
Taku (
talk)
07:27, 7 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:DMFD, "drafts may be nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion (MfD), but not solely because the draft fails to show that the notability guidelines are satisfied". North America100008:34, 7 June 2020 (UTC)reply
There does seem to exist issues of (a bit of) conflict of interest as well as somehow persistent attempt to create the draft; see the talkpage. The authors of the draft obviously believe the topic should be covered in Wikipedia. I'm just not convinced; there is a lack of what makes this program distinguished, which is not something that can be added in the future, (whence this MfD). --
Taku (
talk)
02:31, 8 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I still don’t believe this program is notable enough to be included in mainspace. The draft looks a sort of finished and so it is unlikely that further development will make it more notable. So, the right course of action is to discontinue the development by deletion. —-
Taku (
talk)
07:27, 7 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:DMFD, "drafts may be nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion (MfD), but not solely because the draft fails to show that the notability guidelines are satisfied". North America100008:34, 7 June 2020 (UTC)reply
There does seem to exist issues of (a bit of) conflict of interest as well as somehow persistent attempt to create the draft; see the talkpage. The authors of the draft obviously believe the topic should be covered in Wikipedia. I'm just not convinced; there is a lack of what makes this program distinguished, which is not something that can be added in the future, (whence this MfD). --
Taku (
talk)
02:31, 8 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.