- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗ plicit 12:43, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Draft:Komito Analytics
As part of WP:FOSS I was patrolling and found this article. Although this topic is very much in our field of intereest, this software has no chance to pass Notability since the source code development ceased 1 year ago and this is just a blackhat SEO effort GavriilaDmitriev ( talk • they/them) 05:22, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete because we are here, but this would have been deleted, maybe later today, as having been an abandoned draft for six months, except that it was nominated on what might have been its last day anyway. It isn't necessary or useful to nominate abandoned drafts for deletion. They expire in six months. If the draft is being diddled with, e.g., by a promoter, then deletion may be in order. Robert McClenon ( talk) 06:16, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment This page was due to be deleted today as a CSD G13 stale draft. But instead, it's been nominated at MFD which will take another week and if the decision is to keep it and there is no further editing on the page, it won't be eligible for G13 status again until September 2022. FYI, you should check the page history on drafts and, if you think they should be deleted, see if it is close to its 6 month expiration date before initiating a MFD. Liz Read! Talk! 19:36, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, only because the draft would otherwise have been G13'd. I agree entirely with Robert and Liz that it is not helpful to nominate stale drafts at MfD: see WP:NMFD. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 01:14, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the widespread criticism. I understand the issue and I'm sorry for what I have caused. But I would like to ask all participants here if this isn't a typical case of WP:Snowball_clause? I made a mistake but it's fixable and I see no reason to further over complicate things while noone spoke in favor of the draft GavriilaDmitriev ( talk • they/them) 06:24, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗ plicit 12:43, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Draft:Komito Analytics
As part of WP:FOSS I was patrolling and found this article. Although this topic is very much in our field of intereest, this software has no chance to pass Notability since the source code development ceased 1 year ago and this is just a blackhat SEO effort GavriilaDmitriev ( talk • they/them) 05:22, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete because we are here, but this would have been deleted, maybe later today, as having been an abandoned draft for six months, except that it was nominated on what might have been its last day anyway. It isn't necessary or useful to nominate abandoned drafts for deletion. They expire in six months. If the draft is being diddled with, e.g., by a promoter, then deletion may be in order. Robert McClenon ( talk) 06:16, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment This page was due to be deleted today as a CSD G13 stale draft. But instead, it's been nominated at MFD which will take another week and if the decision is to keep it and there is no further editing on the page, it won't be eligible for G13 status again until September 2022. FYI, you should check the page history on drafts and, if you think they should be deleted, see if it is close to its 6 month expiration date before initiating a MFD. Liz Read! Talk! 19:36, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, only because the draft would otherwise have been G13'd. I agree entirely with Robert and Liz that it is not helpful to nominate stale drafts at MfD: see WP:NMFD. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 01:14, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the widespread criticism. I understand the issue and I'm sorry for what I have caused. But I would like to ask all participants here if this isn't a typical case of WP:Snowball_clause? I made a mistake but it's fixable and I see no reason to further over complicate things while noone spoke in favor of the draft GavriilaDmitriev ( talk • they/them) 06:24, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.