- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep. —ScottyWong— 06:45, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Draft:Hiroshi Naigai
Fails WP:GNG. User who created draft now banned due to multiple drafts that do not meet WP guidelines to move to article space. AldezD ( talk) 04:02, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No reason to delete. —
Alalch E. 08:58, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- A bit about the subject: Draft talk:Hiroshi Naigai#Links — Alalch E. 09:59, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reviewing everything later in the day, this draft is totally fine and the subject seems notable. — Alalch E. 21:13, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Alalch E. "Totally fine"/"seems notable"? There are no sources in this draft and subject fails WP:GNG. Also, what is the link to NIAGARA SONG BOOK? AldezD ( talk) 00:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- There are some sources, and it
doesn't even matter whether the subject is notable; drafts aren't deleted for this reason.
jp:NIAGARA SONG BOOK. —
Alalch E. 00:12, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- @
User:Alalch E. there are no sources that meet
WP:V.
AldezD (
talk) 00:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Not a completely unsourced biography, no inherently contentious claims, no reason to delete. — Alalch E. 00:51, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- @
User:Alalch E. there are no sources that meet
WP:V.
AldezD (
talk) 00:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep GNG does not apply to drafts, so no reason to delete. -- Pawnkingthree ( talk) 19:45, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep. —ScottyWong— 06:45, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Draft:Hiroshi Naigai
Fails WP:GNG. User who created draft now banned due to multiple drafts that do not meet WP guidelines to move to article space. AldezD ( talk) 04:02, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No reason to delete. —
Alalch E. 08:58, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- A bit about the subject: Draft talk:Hiroshi Naigai#Links — Alalch E. 09:59, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Reviewing everything later in the day, this draft is totally fine and the subject seems notable. — Alalch E. 21:13, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Alalch E. "Totally fine"/"seems notable"? There are no sources in this draft and subject fails WP:GNG. Also, what is the link to NIAGARA SONG BOOK? AldezD ( talk) 00:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- There are some sources, and it
doesn't even matter whether the subject is notable; drafts aren't deleted for this reason.
jp:NIAGARA SONG BOOK. —
Alalch E. 00:12, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- @
User:Alalch E. there are no sources that meet
WP:V.
AldezD (
talk) 00:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Not a completely unsourced biography, no inherently contentious claims, no reason to delete. — Alalch E. 00:51, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- @
User:Alalch E. there are no sources that meet
WP:V.
AldezD (
talk) 00:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep GNG does not apply to drafts, so no reason to delete. -- Pawnkingthree ( talk) 19:45, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.