- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. Draft was speedily deleted at 23:15, 26 March 2018 (UTC) by RHaworth with the deletion rationale being G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion]]. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor Talk 05:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Farhan Ahmed
Autobiography by non-notable teenager that does not make a credible claim of significance. Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:38, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Robert McClenon, with ALL of the sources being TWITTER FACEBOOK INSTAGRAM AND YOUTUBE, it is a G11 regardless of content, as unreliably source and thus un-re-usable. Why do you equivocate on this? Tagged G11. — SmokeyJoe ( talk) 22:19, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Well, it is not unambiguously promotional. G11 goes to content, not sourcing.--
Dlohcierekim (
talk)
22:46, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- It’s unambiguously promotion. It is a young person’s self-promoting CV. G11’s “would need to be fundamentally rewritten“ brings in the solely unreliable sourcing, material solely sourced to unreliable unsuitable sourced minimally needs
WP:TNT. A CV unreliably sourced to non-independent promotional sources most definitely meets G11. —
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
22:58, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- User:Dlohcierekim, you’re an admin. If you were working the G11 category, would you accept, reject, or pass over a {{ db-g11}} tagging of this page? — SmokeyJoe ( talk) 23:03, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- It’s unambiguously promotion. It is a young person’s self-promoting CV. G11’s “would need to be fundamentally rewritten“ brings in the solely unreliable sourcing, material solely sourced to unreliable unsuitable sourced minimally needs
WP:TNT. A CV unreliably sourced to non-independent promotional sources most definitely meets G11. —
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
22:58, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- delete per nom.-- Dlohcierekim ( talk) 22:48, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Well apparently, I passed over. Not to say someone else won't honor it. I don't like getting overturned at
WP:DRV, and that could happen with a dodgy tagging.--
Dlohcierekim (
talk)
23:06, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. I’m thinking the scope of G11 for pages like this could use a discussion at WT:CSD. Many people are understandably cautious with speedy deletion, but as a DRV and MfD regular, I can say that G11 deletions on pages like this never get criticised by consensus at DRV, and declines do lead to SNOW deletion at MfD. — SmokeyJoe ( talk) 23:12, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Well apparently, I passed over. Not to say someone else won't honor it. I don't like getting overturned at
WP:DRV, and that could happen with a dodgy tagging.--
Dlohcierekim (
talk)
23:06, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. Draft was speedily deleted at 23:15, 26 March 2018 (UTC) by RHaworth with the deletion rationale being G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion]]. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor Talk 05:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Farhan Ahmed
Autobiography by non-notable teenager that does not make a credible claim of significance. Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:38, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Robert McClenon, with ALL of the sources being TWITTER FACEBOOK INSTAGRAM AND YOUTUBE, it is a G11 regardless of content, as unreliably source and thus un-re-usable. Why do you equivocate on this? Tagged G11. — SmokeyJoe ( talk) 22:19, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Well, it is not unambiguously promotional. G11 goes to content, not sourcing.--
Dlohcierekim (
talk)
22:46, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- It’s unambiguously promotion. It is a young person’s self-promoting CV. G11’s “would need to be fundamentally rewritten“ brings in the solely unreliable sourcing, material solely sourced to unreliable unsuitable sourced minimally needs
WP:TNT. A CV unreliably sourced to non-independent promotional sources most definitely meets G11. —
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
22:58, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- User:Dlohcierekim, you’re an admin. If you were working the G11 category, would you accept, reject, or pass over a {{ db-g11}} tagging of this page? — SmokeyJoe ( talk) 23:03, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- It’s unambiguously promotion. It is a young person’s self-promoting CV. G11’s “would need to be fundamentally rewritten“ brings in the solely unreliable sourcing, material solely sourced to unreliable unsuitable sourced minimally needs
WP:TNT. A CV unreliably sourced to non-independent promotional sources most definitely meets G11. —
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
22:58, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- delete per nom.-- Dlohcierekim ( talk) 22:48, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Well apparently, I passed over. Not to say someone else won't honor it. I don't like getting overturned at
WP:DRV, and that could happen with a dodgy tagging.--
Dlohcierekim (
talk)
23:06, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. I’m thinking the scope of G11 for pages like this could use a discussion at WT:CSD. Many people are understandably cautious with speedy deletion, but as a DRV and MfD regular, I can say that G11 deletions on pages like this never get criticised by consensus at DRV, and declines do lead to SNOW deletion at MfD. — SmokeyJoe ( talk) 23:12, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Well apparently, I passed over. Not to say someone else won't honor it. I don't like getting overturned at
WP:DRV, and that could happen with a dodgy tagging.--
Dlohcierekim (
talk)
23:06, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.