- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:58, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Ethan Paisley
Advertorially-pitched draft about an aspiring filmmaker, which makes no strong or properly sourced claim that he actually passes WP:CREATIVE for anything as of today. Which wouldn't normally be fatal in draftspace, because drafts are granted some time for improvement -- but since the first rejection in April, the creator has simply punched the resubmit button two more times without actually editing so much as a comma of the article's content to actually address the reasons why the first reviewer rejected it. So this is crossing the line into pointless disruption of the AFC process. Bearcat ( talk) 15:43, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- Update: Creator resubmitted the article a third time after this discussion was under way. This time they made some actual changes to the article, but those changes amounted to removing existing sources rather than adding genuinely suitable new ones. Instead of being parked on 26 inadequate sources, it's now parked on just six sources which are still inadequate. For the record, while it's impossible to verify, because the draft is being created and submitted by an anonymous IP, I strongly suspect that this is a direct conflict of interest by Paisley himself or a friend or relative. Bearcat ( talk) 17:15, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as wasting our time. No notability and repeated attempts to find a reviewer asleep at the switch. Legacypac ( talk) 16:25, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. If he can't be bothered to support his claims, we can't be bothered to host his CV. -- Calton | Talk 23:18, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:58, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Ethan Paisley
Advertorially-pitched draft about an aspiring filmmaker, which makes no strong or properly sourced claim that he actually passes WP:CREATIVE for anything as of today. Which wouldn't normally be fatal in draftspace, because drafts are granted some time for improvement -- but since the first rejection in April, the creator has simply punched the resubmit button two more times without actually editing so much as a comma of the article's content to actually address the reasons why the first reviewer rejected it. So this is crossing the line into pointless disruption of the AFC process. Bearcat ( talk) 15:43, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- Update: Creator resubmitted the article a third time after this discussion was under way. This time they made some actual changes to the article, but those changes amounted to removing existing sources rather than adding genuinely suitable new ones. Instead of being parked on 26 inadequate sources, it's now parked on just six sources which are still inadequate. For the record, while it's impossible to verify, because the draft is being created and submitted by an anonymous IP, I strongly suspect that this is a direct conflict of interest by Paisley himself or a friend or relative. Bearcat ( talk) 17:15, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as wasting our time. No notability and repeated attempts to find a reviewer asleep at the switch. Legacypac ( talk) 16:25, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. If he can't be bothered to support his claims, we can't be bothered to host his CV. -- Calton | Talk 23:18, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.