- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: procedural close, as the page is now outside the jurisdiction of MFD since it's in mainspace. I would recommend either WP:AFD or a WP:BOLD redirection if there is still notability concerns. -- Tavix ( talk) 20:32, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Ensign N181
Another tendentious draft by an editor well-known to the F1 project for creating multiple poor articles. This one fails to get anywhere near passing project notability and should be deleted before other editors have to spend time tidying up. Eagleash ( talk) 19:03, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete - typical product of this editor: no detail, poor sourcing, no notability established, poor writing. Basically nothing to recommend it. This car will never satisfy any notability guidelines anyway. Bretonbanquet ( talk) 20:23, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Comment/update As happened previously here, the creator of the page twice removed the MfD notice whilst logged out and then logged in to move it to mainspace. In the circumstances it will ultimately be turned into a redirect to the team page and this discussion can probably be closed. Thanks. Eagleash ( talk) 18:57, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: procedural close, as the page is now outside the jurisdiction of MFD since it's in mainspace. I would recommend either WP:AFD or a WP:BOLD redirection if there is still notability concerns. -- Tavix ( talk) 20:32, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Ensign N181
Another tendentious draft by an editor well-known to the F1 project for creating multiple poor articles. This one fails to get anywhere near passing project notability and should be deleted before other editors have to spend time tidying up. Eagleash ( talk) 19:03, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete - typical product of this editor: no detail, poor sourcing, no notability established, poor writing. Basically nothing to recommend it. This car will never satisfy any notability guidelines anyway. Bretonbanquet ( talk) 20:23, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Comment/update As happened previously here, the creator of the page twice removed the MfD notice whilst logged out and then logged in to move it to mainspace. In the circumstances it will ultimately be turned into a redirect to the team page and this discussion can probably be closed. Thanks. Eagleash ( talk) 18:57, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.