The result of the discussion was: delete . CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:47, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
One of over 50 ( User:TakuyaMurata/Drafts) very old Draft pages that are less than stubs by an editor that absolutely refuses [1] to bring them up to article standard or even group the info in his userspace [2]. If no one thinks this topic important enough to at least make it into a meaningful stub and provide some references for verification and to establish notability, it should be deleted. Draft space is not for the indefinate hosting of material not good enough for mainspace. Legacypac ( talk) 08:38, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Drafts are administration pages in the Draft namespace where new articles may be stored. They help facilitate new articles to develop and receive feedback before being moved to Wikipedia's mainspace.therefore your rejoinder is invalid. Hasteur ( talk) 00:14, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
In fact, a redirect page may even avoid the creation of duplicate articles on the same subject, and thereby actually save data space.Furthermore, if you cared about these pages you'd put up and actually improve your already existing creations instead of tendentiously filibustering any attempts to clean up the pages you've already made and have expressed only the bare minimum to kick the problem down the road until the next time we notice your pages are still out there and still have the same problems. Last May's discussion clearly indicated that the Math Wikiproject saw problems with your creations, yet you elect to claim that the community saw no problems with it. One of your creations was noted again this year for the exact same reason, and still you elect to claim community consensus. Even now some of the community has extended you an olive branch by letting you keep the pages in your userspace, but you don't want that. The only reasoning left is you want the creation credit. Hasteur ( talk) 00:14, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete . CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:47, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
One of over 50 ( User:TakuyaMurata/Drafts) very old Draft pages that are less than stubs by an editor that absolutely refuses [1] to bring them up to article standard or even group the info in his userspace [2]. If no one thinks this topic important enough to at least make it into a meaningful stub and provide some references for verification and to establish notability, it should be deleted. Draft space is not for the indefinate hosting of material not good enough for mainspace. Legacypac ( talk) 08:38, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Drafts are administration pages in the Draft namespace where new articles may be stored. They help facilitate new articles to develop and receive feedback before being moved to Wikipedia's mainspace.therefore your rejoinder is invalid. Hasteur ( talk) 00:14, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
In fact, a redirect page may even avoid the creation of duplicate articles on the same subject, and thereby actually save data space.Furthermore, if you cared about these pages you'd put up and actually improve your already existing creations instead of tendentiously filibustering any attempts to clean up the pages you've already made and have expressed only the bare minimum to kick the problem down the road until the next time we notice your pages are still out there and still have the same problems. Last May's discussion clearly indicated that the Math Wikiproject saw problems with your creations, yet you elect to claim that the community saw no problems with it. One of your creations was noted again this year for the exact same reason, and still you elect to claim community consensus. Even now some of the community has extended you an olive branch by letting you keep the pages in your userspace, but you don't want that. The only reasoning left is you want the creation credit. Hasteur ( talk) 00:14, 29 July 2017 (UTC)