- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus . No consensus to delete at this time, but no prejudice against re-nom if the user starts resubmitting aggressively. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:09, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Paid spam. Legacypac ( talk) 04:58, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Weak Keep only for procedural reasons that the author has complied with the rules concerning paid spam, and that being paid spam is not in itself a reason for deletion in draft space. The rules say that paid spam in draft space should be reviewed by neutral editors. The author hasn't yet submitted it for review. Robert McClenon ( talk) 22:35, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Working on collecting sources to prove notability. Will be keeping in draft space for foreseeable future until sources can be located to indicate notability. Comeongerry ( talk) 00:09, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment User:Robert McClenon this popped on my watchlist because I've previously CSD'd G11 it User_talk:375mon#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_Draft:Bram_Bessoff after the page was declined at least 3 times (see notices further up that page). The account promoting this previoously was blocked for undisclosed paid editing User_talk:375mon#September_2018. Legacypac ( talk) 17:51, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - User:Comeongerry - No, no, no. Do not waste your time working on collecting sources to prove notability. Notability in itself will not get your draft accepted. Tone is also an issue, and a paid editor who thinks that they can write neutrally is usually completely wrong. It is not up to you whether to keep in draft space for the foreseeable future. Read the law of holes. You are digging yourself in. Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:29, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus . No consensus to delete at this time, but no prejudice against re-nom if the user starts resubmitting aggressively. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:09, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Paid spam. Legacypac ( talk) 04:58, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Weak Keep only for procedural reasons that the author has complied with the rules concerning paid spam, and that being paid spam is not in itself a reason for deletion in draft space. The rules say that paid spam in draft space should be reviewed by neutral editors. The author hasn't yet submitted it for review. Robert McClenon ( talk) 22:35, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Working on collecting sources to prove notability. Will be keeping in draft space for foreseeable future until sources can be located to indicate notability. Comeongerry ( talk) 00:09, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment User:Robert McClenon this popped on my watchlist because I've previously CSD'd G11 it User_talk:375mon#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_Draft:Bram_Bessoff after the page was declined at least 3 times (see notices further up that page). The account promoting this previoously was blocked for undisclosed paid editing User_talk:375mon#September_2018. Legacypac ( talk) 17:51, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - User:Comeongerry - No, no, no. Do not waste your time working on collecting sources to prove notability. Notability in itself will not get your draft accepted. Tone is also an issue, and a paid editor who thinks that they can write neutrally is usually completely wrong. It is not up to you whether to keep in draft space for the foreseeable future. Read the law of holes. You are digging yourself in. Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:29, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.